“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant main effect of language, F (1,70) = 2.94, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.04, suggesting the English-speaking children ( M = 0.40, SD = 1.96) were more likely to imitated the demonstrated manner versus the path.

Importantly, a marginally significant interaction effect was found, b = 0.44, p = 0.09.

Cluster-statistics, conducted on the pre-post differences scores of the two groups, revealed a marginally significant cluster (cluster statistic, p = 0.09) at posterior electrode locations (Figures 4C,D ).

There was a tendency for readers to have longer reading times on pseudowords in the incongruent condition than pseudowords in the balanced condition; the effect was marginally significant for first fixation duration (mean difference = 9ms, b = -0.02, SE = 0.01, t = -1.78, p = 0.09) and gaze duration (mean difference = 21ms, b = -0.04, SE = 0.03, t = -1.73, p = 0.09), and significant for total fixation time (mean difference = 58ms, b = -0.08, SE = 0.04, t = -1.99, p < 0.05).

We found a marginally significant negative geographic distance decay of similarity (1- D B ; Mantel r = −0.29, p < 0.09) ( Fig 4A ).

Further analysis indicated that for the intact scenes, the accuracy rates of the happy faces in the positive scenes ( M = 0.946, SE = 0.012) were marginally significantly higher than the happy faces in the negative scenes ( M = 0.920, SE = 0.019, p = 0.090), and the differences of the accuracy rates between the fearful faces in the negative scenes ( M = 0.953, SE = 0.014) and the fearful faces in the positive scenes ( M = 0.933, SE = 0.019, p = 0.072) were also marginally significant.

Results Alcohol intake (≥20 g/day) showed a marginally significant association with the incidence of eCLE in participants without hiatal hernia (0 vs. ≥20 g/day; odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–2.85, P = 0.09) but not in participants with hiatal hernia (0 vs. ≥20/day; OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.59–1.65; P = 0.95).

In partial support of H5, when punishment was the outcome variable, the overall model was marginally significant, R 2 = .20, F (2,32) = 2.60, p = .09.

The relationship between Tapping SPR and the Wrist Width measurement was marginally significant following Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, r (18) = 0.49, p = 0.09.

As both age and gambling status are known to be related to Ki values (Berry et al ., 2016 ; van Holst et al ., 2017 ), we next regressed sEBR onto Ki values while adding these two variables as covariates, revealing a marginally significant negative relationship between sEBR and dopamine synthesis capacity (β = −1.82, P = 0.09).

Furthermore, we performed a meta-analysis to combine the evidence of both studies and observed a significant association of the relative neuronal proportion with APOE ε4 allele ( p = 1.86 × 10 −02 ) and marginally significant association for the relative astrocytic relative proportion ( p = 0.09).

Within the individual cohorts, mean-min RH during the larval phase had a marginally significant impact on the overall larval numbers ( r 2 = 0.23, p = 0.09, df = 1, 11) ( Figure 6 D).

The hypothesized three-way interaction between income, inequality and economic system justification was marginally significant, B = 4.11, SE = 2.45, p = .09.

As shown in Table 4 , multivariate regression analysis identified GCL average thickness as the significant factor affecting MD from SITA 10-2 ( p = 0.009 in model 1), and deep VD as marginally significant factor ( p = 0.090 in model 1).

Comparing the correlation between maternal AQ and MEPC scores by assumed child’s gender A marginally significant negative correlation was observed between maternal AQ total and MEPC total scores in both genders (boys: r = –0.06, p = 0.09; girls: r = –0.25, p = 0.08).

A 2 (tested, control) X 2 (with-context, without-context) X 2 (neutral item, misled item) ANOVA revealed a marginally significant 3-way interaction, F (1, 116) = 2.95, p = .09, ƞ 2 p = .03.

Age (χ 2 (1) = 6.37, p = 0.01), mother’s education level (χ 2 (3) = 9.25, p = 0.03) were significant variables, and months spent with sports was marginally significant (χ 2 (1) = 2.98, p = 0.09).

Results Wait duration, justice perceptions, and aggressive tendencies The regression analyses confirmed a marginally significant positive influence of wait duration on aggressive tendencies (β = 0.55, p = 0.09), partially supporting Hypothesis 1.

Gender was a marginally significant factor for depression ( r = 0.04, p = 0.09).

These effects should be interpreted in the light of a marginally significant interaction in Step 2 ( O R =4.436, p =0.090).

The unique effect of generating a metacognitive definition of playing was marginally significant, Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.93, p = .09.

Our analysis revealed that the impact on recent stock-outs of modern contraceptive methods was marginally significant with a relatively narrow confidence interval (-0.12, 95% CI:-0.25–0.02, p = 0.09), possibly suggesting that more exposed facilities may be less likely to experience stock-outs.

The interaction between Feedback Condition and Feedback Valence was marginally significant (F(1,22) = 3.18, p = .09, η p 2 = .13).

The interaction between time and group was marginally significant, F (2, 71) = 2.50, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02, as did the main effect of group , F (2, 71) = 2.45, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.04.

The correlation between this threat effect and the interaction term from the ANOVA on fixations was marginally significant, r = 0.331, p = 0.09.