However follow up bootstrap p values (based on 500 iterations) showed that the two cluster solution was marginally significant ( p = 0.04) whereas the three cluster solution was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.052) with the latter therefore a better fit to the data.
In contrast, this association was negative and marginally significant for the chromosomes involved in fusion/fission polymorphisms (Spearman's rho = −0.19, P -value = 0.04; Supplemental Table 4 ).
After sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, and race), smoking status, hearing impairment, and visual impairment (Models 2‐5), the HR for digital isolation was attenuated but remained marginally significant (eg, Model 5: HR 1.23; P =.04).
The difference between the two conditions was marginally significant in the high-anchor condition, F (1,188) = 4.51, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.02 (95 CI: 01.00–0.08), but not in the low-anchor condition, F (1,188) = 0.68, p = 0.41.
Recently, a large-scale retrospective study ( n = 1048) based on National Cancer Database showed preoperative radiotherapy contributed to a prolonged OS with a marginally significant P value (log-rank P = 0.04), compared with patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy [ 19 ].
The concave-up (down-up) shape of the average differentiation-time trajectory was marginally significant over a linear model (F-test, p = 0.04; see also Figures VIII–XVI in Document Z1; STAR Methods ).
Thbs1-/- cells in clusters 12 and 14 showed marginally significant depletion of the BMP4 signature (p=0.04 and p=0.023, respectively).
Secondly they showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.04) in the rate of lymph node involvement, with the highest being among Her2-overexpressing subtype (56%), followed by luminal B (47%), basal-like (41%), and luminal A (34%).
The Wald test values for these likelihood ratio tests suggest that models with interaction models for giving birth and food security were significant for eating last (interaction p < 0.001) and marginally significant for minimum dietary diversity (interaction p = 0.04).
When maternal occupation was adjusted for in a multivariate analysis, neonates delivered by single mothers were twice as likelier to be admitted with EOS, although marginally significant (AOR = 2.167, 95% CI = 1.010−4.648, p = .04).
For these regions, the analysis indicated a significant main effect of Adaptation (V4: F 1,12 = 29.5, P < 0.001; VO: F 1,12 = 21.6, P < 0.001), and a significant Adaptation by Adaptor interaction (V4 marginally significant: F 1,12 = 5.1, P = 0.04; VO: F 1,12 = 7.4, P = 0.018).
When SNVs were classified by functional effect, only “missense near splice site” mutations were marginally significant ( P =0.04, Supplementary Figure 1 ).
Analyses were re-performed with multivariate outliers, and the results did not change except for the path between violence at time 2 predicting perfectionistic strivings at time 3 that became marginally significant (β = 1.23, p = 0.04) For the second model estimating the cross-lagged effect of perfectionistic concerns on violence towards the offspring, it showed adequate fit (χ 2 (4) = 80.5, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.87; TLI = 0.53; RMSEA = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.24, 0.34], SRMR = 0.06).
Yet, we found that frost had a weak but marginally significant effect on bacterial composition (permanova: F (1,6) = 3.199; p = 0.04; Fig. 2D ).
In pairwise session comparisons, we found no effect of session on model-free or model-based control or on the balance between model-based and model-free control (all p > 0.14), except for a marginally significant increase in model-free control in session 3 compared to session 1 (p = 0.04).
Another SNP rs10941679 showed a marginally significant association after adjusting for age and sex in the additive genetic model (adjusted OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01-2.04, p = 0.040).
We found changes in GATA3 activity were predicted to be significantly associated with severity as defined by the univariate model ( P = 1.62E-05), whereas RORA was marginally significant ( P = .04) and STAT1/2/4 and SMADs were not significant ( P > .05).
Analysis of follow-up scores without normalisation for interval to follow-up showed an almost identical pattern of significance, the only difference being a marginally significant difference for ACE-R score between visits in the PSP group (p=0.04).
We also observed a marginally significant association between PANSS positive subscore and CFH ( p = 0.04), as shown in Supplementary Figure S1 . 4.
While the comparison between 2022 and 2023 was marginally significant ( p = 0.04).
However, the spatial coefficient of variation showed only a marginally significant correlation ( r =−0 . 34 , p = . 04 ).
There were marginally significant differences between follow-up and lost participants with respect to age ( P =.04).
Further analysis of data subsets with similar age distribution across the three ethnicity groups (Pearson's Chi‐square test) revealed a marginally significant ( p = .04) trend toward more frequent hospitalization for Hispanic or Black/African American plasma donors in comparison to White/Caucasian American plasma donors ( Table S1 ), despite the underrepresentation of elderly donors in this subpopulation.
The results revealed that for young senders, relationship had a marginally significant effect on literality, χ 1 2 = 4.48, p = 0.04; this was true in old senders, χ 1 2 = 17.15, p < 0.001.
There was a marginally significant difference in marked sterile male dispersal (AD) among the three single-point releases (Poisson GLM, deviance − 2.055, df = 2, P = 0.04), but pairwise differences in dispersal distance among the three single-point releases were not statistically significant.