“marginally significant”

Table S4 indicates that the mediation effects between CRF and RAVLT could partially be accounted for by moderation, such that including the interaction terms led to a marginally significant R 2 change (= 0.013, p = 0.04), but neither interaction term had statistically significant coefficients. 4.

Additionally, marginally significant reductions in beta power (~0 to 1 min, P = 0.04, cluster corrected) were observed during the first minute post-DMT administration.

Relationships between cooperativity and specialization versus network node and edge counts were either statistically significant or marginally significant (p = 0.04 and 0.06, 0.07 and 0.11, respectively) ( Fig. 4C, 4D ).

In contrast, naïve CT26 cells exhibited a limited response to their own conditioned media, showing a marginally significant drop in GFP signal at 24 hpi ( P = 0.04) but no deviations in viral titer.

Fisher’s combined probability test did not show statistically significant evidence for association ( P = 0.54); yet, Stouffer’s Z score method which considers the direction of association showed a marginally significant collective evidence for association with SDR at these 34 loci ( P = 0.04).

Moreover, the marginally significant difference in PVD at baseline ( P = 0.04) represents a limitation of the present study.

Sex, expressed as the percentage of a model-building group that was male participants, was marginally significant and low fit (p = 0.04, r 2 = 0.01).

In boys, a marginally significant difference between groups was present for age (p = 0.04) and BMI (p = 0.04), with higher baseline values among controls ( Table 2 ).

However, the aged effect on LT was very small and the P value was marginally significant in this study (P = 0.04).

The only notable correlation we detect is at Nitra Horné Krškany, where we found a marginally significant signal of variation across families for δ 13 C carbon isotopes (Kruskal-Wallis=17.20, N=26, P =0.04) ( Supplementary Table 16 ), providing some evidence that families sourced food from different landscape contexts, either through variation in direct consumption or through variation in consumption of animals eating these plants 27 .

The association between a UO threshold <1.0 mL/kg/hour and the primary outcome was found marginally significant (crude OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.16, p=0.04).

However, our direct comparison of classes also revealed that the differential for the heterochromatic mark H3K27me3 is significantly higher for LowOc than for HighOc sites (although the P -value = 0.04, which is marginally significant).

A marginally significant 3-way interaction between group (AI and human observer), expression, and gender [F(1,233) = 4.28, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.02], probably resulted from the larger decrease in performance for male smiling faces compared to female smiling faces in human, but not AI, estimations of age.

4 ; and Table 2 –30-day unplanned readmission; Table 3 –30-day mortality; and Additional file 2 : Table S2–30-day unplanned readmission/mortality) showed the proportion of overall variation in outcomes explained by variation between hospitals (Model 1) was not statistically significant for unplanned readmission (ICC = .0205, p = 0.12) or mortality (ICC = 0.0000), while the between-hospital variation in the combined readmission/mortality outcome was marginally significant in the null model, explaining 3.0% of the total variance in outcomes ( p = 0.04).

1D ), we noted a positive but NS correlation between ADAMTS5 staining and proteinuria ( r = +0.36; p = 0.12) and a marginally significant negative correlation with eGFR ( r = −0.46; p = 0.04) indicating that ADAMTS5 might be increased as kidney function declines in IgAN, causing reduction in glomerular filtration (eGFR) and increase in urine protein concentration ( Fig. 1D ).

There were significant or marginally significant improvements from Follow-ups #2 to #3 after the booster training in the prevalence of the 2 items (54% to 88% for ability to define obesity, P = .040; and 58% to 88% for ability to screen patients, P = .079).

In contrast, this association was negative and marginally significant for the chromosomes involved in fusion/fission polymorphisms (Spearman's rho = −0.19, P -value = 0.04; Supplemental Table 4 ).

Overall, IM was more common in children of younger than of older mothers; the same was observed in those with IM aged 11 and over, though differences were marginally significant (p = 0.04) and fairly small (Table 2 ).

BD led to a marginally significant effect in females when all three sites were included ( p = 0.04 for a 1% change in median), which was not seen in the two‐site dataset ( p = 0.3, 0% change in median).

In cases where vaccination status was undisclosed, a marginally significant gender difference was observed ( p = 0.04), though specific pairwise differences were not identified in post-hoc tests.

There was a marginally significant difference in marked sterile male dispersal (AD) among the three single-point releases (Poisson GLM, deviance − 2.055, df = 2, P = 0.04), but pairwise differences in dispersal distance among the three single-point releases were not statistically significant.

The relationship of “perceived disadvantages” on initiation was negative and marginally significant (β = −08, t = −2.035, p = 0.04).

Finally, the number of symptoms at diagnosis was a marginally significant predictor of the number of symptoms three months after recovery ( p = 0.04).

Despite showing no significant main effect of migraine ( F < 1), there was a marginally significant interaction effect, F (2, 106) = 3.32, p = .04.

Comparisons of differing association between fatal and nonfatal events showed significant/marginally significant differences in the relationships between FEV 1 and FVC and fatal CHD and nonfatal MI ( P = 0.04 and P = 0.08, respectively).