“marginally significant”

Post hoc analyses showed that children in the low grade responded more slowly than the children in middle and high grades (ps < 0.05), and children from the middle grade exhibited longer reaction times than the ones in the high grades (p = 0.09, marginally significant).

Similarly, PERMANOVA analyses found a significant difference between age groups ( p = .05) and a marginally significant difference in dispersion between groups ( p = .09).

In partial support of H5, when punishment was the outcome variable, the overall model was marginally significant, R 2 = .20, F (2,32) = 2.60, p = .09.

Religion was marginally significant ( p = 0.09).

However, replacing SB with MVPA had a marginally significant association with better MCS scores ( p = 0.09).

Donation to environmental charity There was a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (3, 860) = 2.17, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.01.

Based on logistic regression, the effect of conspecific density on the probability of mortality differed by species: brown shrimp exhibited a marginally significant trend towards D-D mortality when also accounting for shrimp size ( p = 0.09) while white shrimp did not exhibit density-dependence ( p = 0.58; Fig 5 ).

Unlike RT for the reversals, a marginally significant sex × test type interaction was found ( F (1,14) = 3.33, p = 0.09, partial η 2 = 0.19).

In drug overdose suicides, the difference between the mean age of men (53.78 ± 15.13) and women (45.00 ± 17.33) is marginally significant ( p = 0.090).

The interaction between time and group was marginally significant, F (2, 71) = 2.50, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02, as did the main effect of group , F (2, 71) = 2.45, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.04.

4 Consistent with Study 1, people who scored higher on approach relationship goals planned dates that were more exciting, as rated by themselves, b = .34, SE = .07, CI [.21 to .46], β = .35, p < .001 and by outside observers, albeit the latter was marginally significant, b = .13, SE = .08, CI [−.02 to .29], β = .12, p = .09.

month of measurement, was not statistically significant 1 minute after intake (P = 0.53), but marginally significant 15 minutes after intake (P=0.09).

However, the effect over lateral motor areas remained marginally significant even when posterior 8–14 Hz activity was included as a co-variate ( β =−0.068±0.038, t 20 =−1.8, P =0.09), suggesting that this motor effect was at least partially distinct from the more posterior effect.

The main effect of gender was not significant, F (1, 73) = 1.87, p = 0.18, η 2 p = 0.03; however, the interaction between gender and age was marginally significant, F (3, 77) = 2.25, p = 0.09, η 2 p = 0.09.

The results for intraspecific variability contrast with the effects found for the intraindividual level, as only for intraindividual FDiv of PC2 we found a marginally significant decrease with tree species richness (χ 2 (df = 1) = 2.74, P = 0.09, β = −0.09; Supplementary Fig. 2c ).

Since the correlation between anxious attachment and avoidant attachment scores was marginally significant ( r = 0.146, p = 0.09), a two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with other style scores as a covariant was performed on all dependent variables.

On average, decoding accuracies based on all electrodes were slightly lower (M = 70.1%, SD = 5.1%) and the difference was marginally significant ( t [13] = 1.84, p = .09).

The interaction effect between leadership support and team size reveals that the association between change in leadership support and work satisfaction is positive and significant for small-sized teams (effect size = 0.53, SE = 0.20, p = 0.01, CI low = 0.12; CI high = 0.93), it is positive but not significant for average-sized teams (effect size = 0.11, SE = 0.14, p = 0.47, CI low = −0.19; CI high = 0.40), and it is negative and marginally significant for large teams (effect size = −0.32, SE = 0.18, p = 0.09, CI low = −0.69; CI high 0.06; see also the slopes depicted in Figure 3 ).

In multivariate analyses with confounder adjustments, the association of mid-FAS with risk of GDM was marginally significant [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.08, 95% CI 0.99, 1.17; p = 0.09], whereas its association with lower risks of GHDs (aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74, 0.96) and pre-eclampsia (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67, 0.97) persisted ( Table 2 ).

Apart from a marginally significant effect of age ( p = 0.09), no other effects or interactions were significant ( p ’s ≥ 0.13).

While improvements in cold-related symptoms among the SBHE school children were marginally significant (−0.05 SD [−0.10, −0.01], p = 0.09), the overall trends indicated general improvement in health as well as healthy behaviours across all schools, irrespective of treatment status.

When attitude importance was low, the indirect effect through humanitarian considerations was marginally significant ( B = .045, SE = .033, p = .090), and when it was high it was not significant ( B = −.018, SE = .046, p = .347).

For transparency, marginally significant effects (0.05 < p < 0.09) are also reported.

Our study, however, showed that PAD had only a marginally significant association with smoking (p value = 0.09).

S2C, D ); the Shannon index showed a marginally significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.09 for male and p = 0.07 for female, Supplementary Fig.