Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.091.8× alphagold
The second axis, which explains 6.9% of the variation in bacterial community composition, was unrelated to cumulative precipitation but a marginally significant relationship was noted between this axis and the starting weight of the cadaver ( y = -0.14x + 25.60; F 1,12 = 3.43; P = 0.09; r 2 = 0.22).
marginally significantP = 0.091.8× alphagold
Indeed, we examined the correlation analysis between cycling performance (i.e., mean and peak power in 10-second sprint cycling) and urinary 8-OHdG, and we found that the relationships between these exercise performances and the oxidative damage were marginally significant, respectively (mean power: r = –0.44, P = 0.09; peak power: r = –0.49, P = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Furthermore, there were marginally significant differences in vital exhaustion at pretest ( t (15.72) = −1.77, p = 0.09, d = 0.54) with lower scores for remainders ( M = 4.29, SD = 3.59) versus the dropouts ( M = 6.67, SD = 5.04), but not significant differences in symptoms of depression ( t < 1.00).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
The diversity including richness and Shannon diversity were lower in subjects treated by antibiotics within five days vs subjects who did not ( S6 Fig .), with a marginally significant difference on richness (p = 0.09 for richness and 0.18 for Shannon diversity), suggesting IV antibiotic treatment may influence the complexity of the premature infant intestinal microbiome.
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
The interaction effect between leadership support and team size reveals that the association between change in leadership support and work satisfaction is positive and significant for small-sized teams (effect size = 0.53, SE = 0.20, p = 0.01, CI low = 0.12; CI high = 0.93), it is positive but not significant for average-sized teams (effect size = 0.11, SE = 0.14, p = 0.47, CI low = −0.19; CI high = 0.40), and it is negative and marginally significant for large teams (effect size = −0.32, SE = 0.18, p = 0.09, CI low = −0.69; CI high 0.06; see also the slopes depicted in Figure 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.091.8× alphagold
The non-significant correlation between masculinity and attractiveness ( r = −.02) reversed in direction, increased in magnitude, and became marginally significant ( sr = .22, t = 1.72, p = 0.09; see Figure 2C ) when judgments of aggression ( sr = −.37, t = −2.82, p < 0.01) were added as a simultaneous predictor (VIF = 1.76).