The quality of roof material showed a marginally significant negative association with anemia levels ( β = −0.002, SE = 0.001, CR = −1.649, p = 0.099), suggesting that better roofing may be linked to lower anemia levels.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
In the present study, patients with CD10 expression showed a better survival rate at a marginally significant level ( p =0.0992).
A marginally significant correlation has been found between DM treatment and depression ( P value = .0992), indicating a potential relationship.
fruticosa exhibited a marginally significant positive relationship, and only in the dark photoperiod (ANOVA F 1,5 = 4.083, P = 0.0993).
A marginally significant decrease in plasma interleukin-6 levels was observed in the CgA − group ( p = 0.0995), while there was no change in the CgA + group ( p = 0.6398).
We note that after merging these pairs there was still a marginally significant excess of differentially expressed OD transcripts within Cf-Inv(1) (Fisher's exact test p = 0.0996).
For the gap effect, children with ASD ( M = 72 ms; SD = 86) showed a marginally significant increase compared to their TD peers ( M = 36 ms; SD = 39), F (1,39) = 2.846, p = 0.0996; however, there was no significant interaction between group and distance, F (1,39) = 0.044, p = 0.834, η p 2 = 0.00 (see Figure 3 ).
The results show a statistically significant decline over time in the mean SBP both among women aged 55 years and older of 0.8 mmHg per year ( p < 0.01) and a marginally significant decline of 0.25 mmHg per year in the younger age group 35–54 ( p < 0.1).
The results supported Hypothesis 2, as the interaction between narcissism and equity ranking was marginally significant (β = 0.123, p < 0.1).
Also, the pooled effect of all species was positive for each species studied, although it was marginally significant (0.05 < P < .1) for C. vulgaris ( Tables 1 and 2 ).
Results that were significant at a p < 0.05 level (or marginally significant (0.05 <= p < 0.10) as indicated) are presented below when a consistent linear trend across the categories in question was evident (curvilinear trends were not considered) and if no cells had zero values and no more than 20% of cells had values less than five.
For work ability, Model 3.9a revealed a marginally significant interaction between SOC and MHI ( p <.10), which became statistically significant in Model 3.9b after removing non-significant predictors.
No demographic or behavioral factor had a statistically significant (Fisher’s 2-sided exact p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.1) association with mortality.
For predictive factors that were marginally significant ( P < 0.1), we calculated the ORs and 95% CIs in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses.
For the inferential statistics, we observed a marginally significant difference at obstacles #1 and #5 ( F (1,124) = 1.75, p < 0.10).
2b ; site 64 was marginally significant at P < 0.10) were found to be under positive selection in the inclusive data (Fig. 3b ), with particular amino acid variable within species but shared between alleles of different species.
All the cross-lagged paths remained significant, except the relationship between functional dependence at T1 and depressive symptoms at T2, which was marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.10).
Fear of COVID-19 had a significant positive correlation ( rs = 0.36-0.42, ps < 0.01) with the three subscales of the DASS (depression, anxiety, stress), and a marginally significant negative correlation with future life satisfaction ( r = -.07, p < .10).
Moreover, the combined treatment increased the abundance of almost all (7 of 10) detected genes involved in N cycling at significant or marginally significant levels ( P ≤ 0.10), similarly to the warming effect alone.
Variables that were marginally significant (p < 0.10) in the univariate analyses were selected as covariates for subsequent multivariate analyses.
This study observed that, at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1), older adults exhibited better glycemic control, potentially due to a lower degree of insulin resistance and higher participation/engagement in programs [ 2 ].
Concerning the differences in transitions between land uses in the four mosaics types, only two transition types showed significant differences ( P <0.05), whereas two more were marginally significant ( P <0.10).
In the sensitivity analysis that considered marginally significant correlates (ie, p < 0.1), we additionally included IADL and contact with healthcare systems to logistic models.
Of note, there were no significant differences between Profiles #2 and #3 for most academic functioning indicators; academic expectations were higher, at a marginally significant trend ( p < .10), for those in Profile #3 ( high general, moderate cultural & critical support ) compared to those in Profile #2 ( moderate general, moderate cultural, & devoid critical support ) for White youth.
In all analysis an alpha level of 0.05 was adopted, but marginally significant results ( P <0.10) are also reported.