“marginally significant”

Variables that were marginally significant (p<0.10) in the univariate analyses were selected as covariates for subsequent multivariate analysis.

To model the association of the PRISM-PC questionnaire domains with the dependent variable (acceptance versus refusal of telephone screening with the TICS), we used logistic regression and adjusted for covariates found to be significant or marginally significant ( P < 0.10) in bivariate analyses.

Marginally significant variables, those considered clinically relevant, and all major interactions were included in the univariate analysis (p <0.10).

A main effect for time was observed (p < .05) suggesting that both groups appeared to increase in reports of EQ over time, with only a marginally significant increase in total EQ for that was greater for the intervention group, as revealed in the Condition by Time interaction (p <.10).

For sentences with a missing VP2, the contrast between main and embedded S1 clause was marginally significant (33 vs. 41%, z = 1.65, p = 0.10). 5.3.

Further analysis showed significant positive correlations between PA and NO 2 ( p < 0.05) and a marginally significant correlation with the abundance of HNFs ( p < 0.1; Table 1 ).

A three-factor within-subject ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between duration and delay ( F (2,40) = 2.69, p < .10, η 2 = .012), and significant main effects of pair-type ( F (1,20) = 75.09, p < .001, η 2 = .208) and duration ( F (2,40) = 24.98, p < .001, η 2 = .170).

2 , N = 13, r = 0.78, P = 0.02) and a marginally significant relationship between k 2 and k 1 – k 2 ( Fig. 2 , N = 13, r = 0.47, P = 0.10).

The stable genes were marginally significant in overlap with the haploinsufficient genes and the OMIM Gene Map (P-value < 0.10).

Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 and marginally significant if P < 0.10.

To determine independent predictors for MACE, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was developed with the significant predictors ( P < 0.05) and the marginally significant ones ( P < 0.10) from the univariate model. 3.

Marginally significant value was set at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

To verify this, a dissimilarity test of adonis was carried out, which showed that differences in microbial community compositions were significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) (Table S1).

Behavioural data Regarding reaction times, hit rates, and false alarms a three-way MANOVAs (target valence x standard valence x attachment security) revealed a marginally significant effect of attachment security (F(1,23) = 3.35, p≤.10, η 2 = .13) on hit rates.

However, due to modest sample size, we also interpret marginally significant effects of P ≤ 0.10.

As illustrated in Figure 4 , there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and group on HR, F = 2.73, p = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.05, indicating that HR was significantly decreased within the control group, p = 0.021, while it did not change in the experimental group, p = 0.279.

Across all analyses, we used the conventional alpha level of p ≤ 0.05 as the criterion for significance, but also report marginally significant findings (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10), specifying effect sizes in all cases.

S4 A , Supplementary Material online). When a test for general population differentiation, that is, irrespective of malaria, was applied using the X T X statistic described by Gunther and Coop (2013) , significant ( P < 0.05) signals were found for SNPs rs1128127 in the DERL3 gene and rs84833095 in the TLR1 gene, and marginally significant signals ( P < 0.10) were found for SNPs rs2706384 in the IRF1 gene and rs1803632 in the GBP7 gene ( supplementary fig.

The expression of all five genes in cluster 1 showed a significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) negative correlation with the bicarbonate concentration, whereas none of the other gene expression patterns were correlated with bicarbonate ( Figure 5 ; Table 2 ).

No demographic or behavioral factor had a statistically significant (Fisher’s 2-sided exact p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.1) association with mortality.

2b ; site 64 was marginally significant at P < 0.10) were found to be under positive selection in the inclusive data (Fig. 3b ), with particular amino acid variable within species but shared between alleles of different species.

Tumor Perfusion Changes Mean blood flow and volume declined significantly ( P < .05) between baseline and the first recheck for the whole tumor and was marginally significant for the tumor center ( P < .1) based on raw P value although none were significant after adjusting for multiple testing (FDR <0.05) (Table 1 ).

Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found on the face-name task, ALT, word updating task and backward digit span, and marginally significant difference ( p < 0.1) was found on the picture updating task.

glutamic acid (D), proline (K)} had a marginally significant (0.05< p ≤0.10) positive association with elevation, and ten others { e . g . alanine (A), arginine (B), aspartic acid (C), glycine (E), histidine (F), leucine (H), phenylalanine (J), serine (L), threonine (M), and valine (O)} had not appreciable association with elevation ( p >0.10) ( Fig 4 ).

Results of our sensitivity analysis were similar for overall and individual gatekeeper behaviors except for questioning, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.10).