“marginally significant”

However, in the case of arousal (χ 2 =5.2, P=0.074), the dominance subscale (χ 2 =5.14, P=0.076), and the number of intrusive memories (χ 2 =5.35, P=0.069), a marginally significant difference between groups was found (0.05<P<0.10).

Marginally significant associations (p-value < 0.10) were also found with the Tail statistic that could corroborate significant associations found in other analyses: education level (negative, p−val = 0.06866), depression (p−val = 0.071907), number of cohabitants (negative, p−val = 0.097342), and anxiety (negative, p−val = 0.098607).

*** P < 0.005, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ms P marginally significant after multiple test correction ( P < 0.1), ns P not significant after multiple test correction.

Significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) apparent Q 10 estimates were observed under both control and warming treatments in all years except 2011 (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).

The amount of time the participants had spent watching Family Guy before was also marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Post hoc pair-wise comparisons with the Bonferroni correction revealed that men with ASDs tended to have marginally significant longer right 4D relative to TD men ( p < 0.10, Cohen’s d = 0.37 [ 46 ]), while no significant difference was found in right 4D length between women with and without ASDs ( p > 0.10, d = 0.41; Fig. 1 a).

Marginally significant findings at p < 0.10 are pointed out in the results section but omitted in the discussion section due to their low evidential value.

For folate in Mozambique, the change was also substantial (28%) and marginally significant (p<0.1, Table 2 ).

Furthermore, the Session by Age group by Switching demand interaction F (1,168) = 4.49, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.03, p = 0.04, as well as the Session by Age group by Maintenance demand interaction F (1,168) = 3.63, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.02, p = 0.06 were at least marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

AF13 showed significant changes in glycolytic compounds glucose and pyruvate with significant decreases ( p < 0.05) in both compounds at 4 DAI in response to stress with glucose and fructose levels showing marginally significant increases at 7 DAI ( p < 0.10; Fig. 3 ).

The Number of Dominant Images A marginally significant association was found between “The number of dominant images” and the two groups of families ( χ 2 = 3.68, p < 0.10).

The final model was obtained by retaining those with P <0.05 and some marginally significant clinical variables with P <0.10.

After adjusting for DunedinPACE, all previously observed significant associations remain at least marginally significant (all p < 0.10).

= 1.239), and the difference is statistically marginally significant ( t (158) = 1.749, p < 0.10).

The findings indicated that the interaction term between student motivation and teacher instruction on process features was marginally significant and negative (γ = −1.27, p < 0.1), indicating that the relationship between student motivational beliefs and their writing achievement was moderated by the frequency of teacher instruction on process features.

The mental health benefits of suburban green spaces became evident, showing marginally significant depression-reducing effects among the older adults ( B = −0.113, p < 0.1), groups with medium economic status ( B = −0.101, p < 0.05), and those with lower education levels ( B = −0.073, p < 0.1).

To assess the importance of the explanatory factors, we performed backwards step-wise model simplification using F-tests (employing Type III Sum of Squares to account for the unbalanced dataset due to high mortality in some species-combinations) to obtain the minimum adequate model, containing only significant terms (whereby we retained marginally significant effects, i.e., P < 0.1).

Negative affect was marginally significant (p=0.10) and was thus included in the next phase of the modeling.

Results were considered significant with P -values ≤ 0.05 and were considered marginally significant at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10.

Differences were deemed significant for p<0.05 and marginally significant for p<0.10 for a two-tailed test.

However, only three items were statistically significant at p < 0.05 level or marginally significant at p < 0.10 level (see Table 3 ).

Statistically significant (p < 0.05) and marginally significant (p < 0.1) variables in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.

ResF personnel had a statistically significant 11.3% lower MHSU for the ‘any’ service category and specifically, a 9.1% lower medication service use, as well as a marginally significant (p≤0.10) 5.4% lower counselling service use.

Correlations were considered significant if p < 0.05 and marginally significant if p < 0.1.