Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
There was a marginally significant influence of subject on plaque size ( P = 0.046), without any significant influence of the side, or the interaction between side and subject ( P > 0.05 for both). 4 Discussion 4.1 Summary of findings We observed a consistency in geometry among carotid atherosclerotic plaques of different sizes, while the plaque size could be significantly different among subjects.
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
26 Notably, while patients with PCI had significantly worse 90-day mRS scores than those with ACI in the unmatched cohort ( Supplemental Table 1 ), this difference was attenuated after matching, remaining marginally significant ( p = 0.046).
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
The interaction between multimorbidity and the presence of a mental health condition was marginally significant when added to the main effects model (contrast P = 0.046), with odds ratios of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.88, 1.04; P = 0.26) for the one‐condition group and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.84, 0.98; P = 0.02) for the multimorbidity group, relative to the no‐condition group, suggesting that the presence of a mental health condition decreases quit probability among people with multimorbidity by more than it does among other participants.
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
ARID5B variants (rs2588969 and rs494288) showed marginally significant association with LOAD in meta-analysis of 2,634 LOAD and 4,201 controls ( P = 0.046 and 0.008, respectively), although the associations did not survive adjustment for covariates ( P = 0.30 and 0.11, respectively).[ 19 ] Other inconclusive association of ARID5B variants included Naj et al.
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Twelve studies including 1,178 patients assessed the incidence of thromboembolic events, and more events were found in the AA group; however, the results were marginally significant (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01–2.15, P = 0.046).