Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Overall, the magnitude of the FID difference (that is, the effect sizes) of populations under low versus high human disturbance was lower, albeit marginally significant, in contrasts made ‘within' a same habitat type (for example, low versus high human disturbance in islands) than in contrasts made ‘between' habitat types (for example, rural versus urban areas; Q b =3.70, df=1, P =0.054).
[15] Line 376 – Where did the variance of 0.15 come from? Does this agree with the experimental data? [16] Line 395 – What is meant by “pre-culture”? [17] Line 419 – What is meant by “standard”? [18] Line 482 – “marginally significant” – The phrasing of these results in the conclusion on line 499-500 seems more appropriate.
3D cell aggregates amplify diffusion signals.
PLoS One · 2024 · PMC12139657
In mutually-adjusted analyses these effects were attenuated but marginally significant effects remained for gender, age and area of London. 3.3 Reporting of fatalities outside London In all three non-London cities, the level of coverage of both cyclist and motorcyclist fatalities was uniformly high across the whole of the study period, including 100% coverage of cyclist fatalities in Bristol and Cambridge (see Table 3 ).
The results from the fully adjusted mixed effect logistic regression model was marginally significant, likely due to the reduced sample size within this sub-stratum, but was consistent in terms of direction with the results of the recursive partitioning analysis: i.e., among non-African American/Black participants in this older age strata who reported having friends or acquaintances in the neighborhood who differed in demographic characteristics from themselves, the odds of being obese were 1.2 higher than for those not reporting this type of neighborhood situation (95 % CI: 1.0, 1.4; p = .095).
Comparison of hyperuricemic patients who did not use ULT (HUA /No gout /No ULT), to the matched reference group (No HUA /No gout /No ULT) showed a marginally significant effect on all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–1.59) due to attrition of case number after matching procedure, and a significant risk of hyperuricemia for CVD mortality (adjusted HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.34–3.39) ( Table 2 ).
When limited to extracolonic sites, the risk of non‐CRC MPC was still elevated compared to the corresponding risk of cancer in the general population with a SIR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.15; AER = 18.8, 95% CI: 16.9, 20.9); however, this significant elevation in risk was primarily in males (SIR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.15; AER = 21.4, 95% CI: 18.5, 24.5), while it was marginally significant in females (SIR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.10).
In a cohort of Canadian women (519 cases) [ 46 ], a marginally significant protective association between total vitamin A intake, preformed vitamin A and β-carotene, and breast cancer was seen.
Does diet affect breast cancer risk?
Breast Cancer Res · 2004 · PMC468678
As a conclusion, for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer, no significant differences in the treatment efficacies of CCRT, IC + CCRT, and CCRT + AC were found, with the exception of a marginally significant improvement in distant control observed following IC + CCRT compared with CCRT alone.