MDM4 SNP34091C was not associated with risk for any of the tumor forms examined, except for a marginally significant association with reduced risk for breast cancer in a recessive model (OR = 0.77: 95% CI = 0.59–0.99).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
A decrease in abdominal pain (OR, 5.23; 95% CI, 0.87 to 31.68; P = 0.070) was found to be marginally significant.
The results of Table 5 show that there was a marginally significant interaction of GP88 with tumor size in DFS, but no hint of interaction between GP88 and any of the other indicators investigated, such as tumor grade, lymph node status, disease stage, PR expression, age, ethnicity and treatments.
Furthermore, Eggers test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value of 0.001 (Table 4 ).
For the WS group, non-verbal mental age significantly contributed to spatial category representations, whilst the contributing influence of spatial language ability was marginally significant.
Factors with 0.05>p>0.001 are referred to as “marginally significant” in the following discussion to provide the reader with some insight into the weaker trends in the data.
However, the findings of this study indicated that female gender was a marginally significant predictor of behavioral problems in 1.5- to 3-year-old toddlers.
In addition, individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis showed a marginally significant decreased risk of premature CAD adjusting for age, gender and BMI (OR = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.486–0.979, P dom = 0.038 and OR = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.520–0.994, P add = 0.046).
Moreover, our use of a stepwise model-building process and multiple tests increased the likelihood of type I error; as such, marginally significant associations should be interpreted with caution.
In Dedza and Ntcheu time in the field is only a marginally significant determinant of choice.
Although the phenotype-to-phenotype mediation became marginally significant, there was little change in its effect size after adding covariates.
PsyCt to FDCt) correlations This yielded a single marginally significant correlation, a little bit improved when the calculations were done for FD_ext by averaging the score for both the PsyCt and the FDCt ( Table 7 and Table 8 ).
There were some marginally significant increases for some metals and 3-PBA for ASD; however further studies are warranted in order to make any definitive association.
In addition, our model showed that fruit juice ( p = 0.066) and bean ( p = 0.100) consumption were marginally significant predictors of the adults’ urinary 3-PBA levels.
For self‐esteem, the expected Condition × Time interaction was marginally significant, indicating a larger increase in RSES scores in the EmoWM group compared to Placebo post‐training.
Even with a more lenient p ‐value criterion, considering p = 0.051 as marginally significant, the effect of the difference between these items would still be considered very low ƞ 2 = 0.01.
genotypes per infection where recombination was inferred) than in workers (0.07±0.05); this difference was marginally significant but only when assuming that queens should a prior i have more recombinants as the primary genotypes reside longer in queens than in workers (Mann-Whitney U, one-tailed P = 0.049).
There is little evidence to suggest that wave action had large effects on fish parameters, which was marginally significant, explaining 9.9% of the variation in fish assemblage structure.
The unstandardized covariance between slopes of relational peer victimization and depression symptoms was marginally significant whereas the standardized correlation was significant (cov = 0.013, s.e. = 0.008, p = .113; r = .589, s.e. = 0.297, p = .047).
It is important to note that the post hoc tests were inconclusive, as the effect of excitatory stimulation was marginally significant, while the effect of inhibitory stimulation was not significant.
The manipulated relevance had only a marginally significant effect on perceived utility in the “public transport story” and no significant effect in the “compulsory vaccination story,” both t s ≤ 1.657, p s ≥ 0.098, d s ≤ 0.135.
forsythia infection is comparable to hDFSCs with only a marginally significant difference 2 h post-infection ( Fig. 5B ).
However, this association for anxiety became marginally significant in model II (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36–0.98, P trend = 0.07).
The univariable regression analysis indicated a marginally significant association between lower 25OHD levels and better vaccine response (proportional odds ratio of having a better antibody response category, per 10 ng/mL increase in 25OHD: 0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.62–0.98, P = 0.03).
Following up marginally significant but hypothesized effects for startle response and SCL, explorative analyses within the groups speak for stronger forgetting of learning conditions and also enhanced generalization of anxiety in the 15 d delay group compared with the 1 d delay group.