“marginally significant”

The IDI was marginally significant in the isolated valve surgery group (p=0.049).

In the model including Persistence, a marginally significant interaction was observed prior to the application of robust standard errors ( β = −0.03, p = .049).

LVEF was marginally significant lower in the CMD-CE (54.8 ± 15.9) as compared to the CMD-OE group (61.1 ± 11.9 ), p= 0.049 (Figura 1).

A marginally significant decrease in FFM% was observed at T1 in respect to baseline (63.70 ± 8.3 at T1 vs 67.42 ± 6.5 at T0, p = 0.049).

In addition, the interaction of perceptual load × group was marginally significant [ F (2, 76) = 3.368, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.081].

This generalized linear mixed model revealed a significant main effect of fairness ( F (1, 3217) = 4.77, p = 0.029) and a marginally significant group by fairness interaction effect ( F (1, 3217) = 3.87, p = 0.049).

The Group × Time interaction was marginally significant [ F (2,89.432 = 3.123, p = 0.049].

There was a marginally significant main effect with a medium effect size [F(1, 66) = 4.02, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.050; p bonf = 0.008] ( Figure 3 ).

The corresponding mRS change score difference at 3 months was marginally significant (p = 0.049).

However, stage IV remains to be a strong independent predictor ( p < 0.001), with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) being marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

Analysing data separately by side showed no significant correlation in the left IMM, whilst in the right IMM the correlation was marginally significant (r = 0.53, 12 df, P = 0.049).

For the 0° azimuth condition, a second-degree polynomial model revealed a marginally significant quadratic age effect (β = 5.26, p = .049, ΔR 2 = .042), suggesting possible accelerated decline in later middle age.

The CSF concentration ratio of Aβ 42 to Aβ 40 showed only a marginally significant ( p = 0.049), age-related increase ( Figure 1D ).

Regarding frequency, no significant interaction between week and group was detected ( P =.81), whereas a marginally significant difference was observed between groups at week 5 ( P =.049).

Glucose The change in serum glucose concentration in the four exercises relative to sedentary trials was marginally significant (F (df 4,11) = 3.38, p = 0.049, Figure 7 ).

We found that stage of disease remained significant for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] of advanced stage, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.73 to 8.48; p=0.001) and OS (HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.16 to 6.88; p=0.022) while the surgical outcome was marginally significant for OS (HR of optimal surgery, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.69; p=0.049).

After controlling for confounders, the intervention group achieved a marginally significant increase in their metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes of moderate intensity physical activity per week ( p = 0.049), and significantly improved fibre intake ( p < 0.001), fat intake ( p = 0.003), and vegetable serves per day ( p = 0.002) from baseline to post-test relative to the control group.

For tooth loss, the highest tertile of tooth loss had a HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.92), and there was a marginally significant linear trend across the tertiles of tooth loss ( p = 0.049).

In contrast, we found only a marginally significant effect of Waveform ( F (1,5) = 6.66, p = 0.049) on activity evoked in thin-type stripes, without significant interaction between this effect and the effects of the other independent factors ( F < 0.88, p > 0.42).

However, as shown by Table 5 below, when adjusting for SGA (by respective tool), the association between weight-based growth failure using IG-21st and adverse language development becomes marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

While the main effect of condition was not significant ( F (1,24) = 1.88, p = 0.18, η p 2 = 0.08), the condition by age interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,24) = 4.31, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.16), suggesting that older adults’ performance was lower when emotional distractors were presented compared with neutral distractors ( F (12) = 5.46, p = 0.039, η p 2 = 0.33 ).

A type-I error could possibly explain this unexpected and marginally significant result ( p = 0.049), or these observations may – at first glance – suggest that C. tamandua males are willing to undermine reproductive isolation.

The Kruskal–Wallis test used to compare English productive vocabulary scores across the three groups showed a marginally significant effect of group, H(2) = 6, p = 0.049.

There was a marginally significant trend for lower survival after infection in kri -flies ( n = 111 GOI and 177 control, Line effect p = 0.049, Table 1 , Figure 2 a).

Costs of the w AlbB infection on egg hatch were similar regardless of storage time, as there was only a marginally significant interaction between Week and Wolbachia infection type (F 10,125 = 1.911, P = 0.049).