“marginally significant”

In Table S5 , we also reported the proteins in each complex that are marginally significant (p < 0.05) based on the univariate association test using mixed effects regression models.

The ANCOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of the CTI ( F (1,82) = 0.85, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.05) and a significant interaction between the CTI and group ( F (1,82) = 7.85, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.09).

Notably, as shown in Table 2 , ACT combined with conventional rehabilitation showed a marginally significant greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with ACT alone ( p = 0.05). 3.3.2 Anxiety Thirteen studies reported the effects of ACT on anxiety symptoms in stroke patients.

For hot EF tasks , as can be seen in Table 8 , in the affective reversal learning task, children made fewer regression errors than adults, with this difference being marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

30 Because marginally significant interaction was found for PA changes and baseline obesity status ( p = 0.05), we conducted stratification analyses by baseline obesity status.

On this measure, there was only one instance in which this test was marginally significant ( p = 0.05): namely, when availability was regressed on measures of governance (i.e., specificity of national mental health plans and legislation), without the inclusion of HDI as a covariate.

When restricting attack rates only to fruits that were held in the beak (indicating potential dispersal), we found the interaction between fruit size and elevation to again be the most important interaction (GLM holding rates ; Figure 6 ; Table A4 ), although in this case, it was marginally significant overall ( p = .05).

There was a marginally significant effect of the interaction between informativeness condition and option type, β = −11.98, t (1254) = −1.959, p = .050, such that estimates were higher for the informative condition than the noninformative condition, but only for the suboptimal option.

There was a marginally significant genotype-by-diagnosis interaction (F 2,110 = 3.08, p = 0.050), which appeared to be driven by CUD patients with homozygous CC, who had shorter latencies on unsuccessful Stop trials compared with healthy control participans of the same genotype (F 1,103 = 3.703, p = 0.057).

For the two studies the relation was positive and statistically significant and for the third was positive and marginally significant (P=0.05).

The mediation results for the positive association between trans fatty acid intake and visuo-spatial learning errors were as follows: the direct effect of trans fats on visuo-spatial learning errors was marginally significant ( B = 0.900, p = 0.05), whereas there was no direct effect of energy intake ( B = 0.0004), and there was no evidence for mediation of the trans fat effect by energy intake (bootstrapping 95% CI = -0.019 to 0.787).

The mediation analysis highlighted a marginally significant indirect effect from T1 exposure to community violence as a witness to T3 bullying perpetration through T2 CDs, β = 0.02, t = 1.96, p = 0.05, 95% C.I.

However, it had marginally significant (at p < .05) effects on the random slope of political participation for perceived social support and loneliness, and these effects went in substantively opposite directions.

The expectation by SA interaction was marginally significant [ F (1,53) = 4.12, p = 0 .05, η p 2 = 0.07], suggesting that memory performance for expected and unexpected stimuli varied with SA level.

The evaluation of the product was positively correlated with the health orientation, r (661) = 0.29, p < 0.001, the ecology orientation, r (661) = 0.17, p < 0.001, and the self-perceived knowledge of healthy eating; however, this relation was marginally significant, r (632) = 0.08, p = 0.05.

Vasopressor-free days showed a marginally significant difference between the low and usual dose groups [3(0–46) vs 3(0–50);p = 0.05].

A Chi-square test revealed a marginally significant association between job category and perceived course disproportion [χ 2 (100) = 124.29, p = 0.050].

Four (TH, Ca 2+ , Fe 2+ , and NH 4 + ) showed a marginally significant increase (P = 0.05–0.07), whereas the other variables did not show a significant pattern, albeit most of the non-significant increases (e.g.

Low anxiety was related to a marginally significant effect of emotion, with poorer performance (that means, i.e., enhanced suppression) for negative compared to neutral scenes, p = 0.05.

As shown in Table 2 , the association between years of CA in high school and adult-onset asthma in middle age was marginally significant at P = 0.050 level.

In peripheral areas, only guttae area ratio in the inferior region exhibited a marginally significant positive correlation (0.29, P < 0.05).

There was also a marginally significant effect of Vignette pair, F (1, 39) = 4.07, p = .05; η partial 2 = .094, as people gave higher innateness ratings to the vignette pair concerning flying compared to those concerning singing.

However, when the analysis was confined to 2017–2022 data, HPV16/18 prevalence decreased from 90.5% to 64.7% among young women aged 20–29 years, and this progressive decrease was marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Cochran‐Armitage trend test). 4.

When doing so, our results can be considered as marginally significant when controlling at FWE (p < 0.05); but still remain significant when controlling at FDR (p < 0.01).

Genes for which a marginally significant signal for positive selection was obtained for the non-cactophilic relatives (to be conservative, we used an uncorrected p -value < 0.05) were excluded.