“moderately significant”

Both groups showed a steeper rate of decline compared to no HSME, but results were moderately significant ( B = -0.235, p = 0.088, B = -0.041, p = 0.058).

ALESCO ® showed a moderately significant increase in pollen non-abortion rate ( p = 0.0892).

Lymphoid neoplasm diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC) presented moderately significant p -values in scores for macrophages ( p = 0.08976), Tgammadelta ( p = 0.08334), and NK cells ( p = 0.1221).

Analysis of the fitness scores based on the presence of intention-to-purchase and product presentation revealed significant main effects of purchase intention ( F 1,38 = 491.84, P < 0.001) and product presentation ( F 1,38 = 10.58, P = 0.002), and a moderately significant interaction effect between the two factors ( F 1,38 = 3.03, P = 0.09).

The influence of age remained moderately significant after adjustment for GDP and urbanity in a multivariate model ( p = 0.09, R 2 = 12.4%); A one-year’s increase in age predicted a 1.0% rise in the prevalence of frailty.

The estimated Moran’s I statistic showed a moderately significant spatial dependence (p = 0.09) in cholera incidence ( Fig 5 ), suggesting exploration of spatial regression.

ervi ( F 1,21 = 35.53, P < 0.0001, Fig 2A ) and moderately significant non-consumptive suppression by the non-enemy A . colemani ( F 1,21 = 3.06, P = 0.09, Fig 2A ).

When controlling for NO 2 , associations with 100–300 nm stayed moderately significant ( p < 0.09).

A moderately significant trend was also observed at 8 h ( p = 0.091).

TMIP 1 was significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1 vs 0 = 1.5832, 95% CI = 1.0726–2.3369, p = 0.0207), and showed moderately significant association with PFS (HR 1 vs 0 = 1.3168, 95% CI = 0.955–1.8157, p = 0.0932).

2 a); however, this elevated distal floret A net on clipped seed heads was only moderately significant ( p = 0.098).

The null hypothesis can be rejected for alpha = 0.1 indicating a moderately significant difference (P-Value = 0.098) (Additional file 1 : Table S6 ).

When all Alus are considered together, a moderately significant association is found between pol III-binding and Alu J + S elements in at least one cell line but not Alu Y elements (odds ratio = 1.6, P = 0.098 in Fisher’s exact test), suggesting that pol III is approximately 1.6 times less likely to bind to an Alu Y element than to an Alu J or S element.

One RCT reported moderately significant (.05 < p < .1) benefits for distal radius (but not tibia) bone measurements when comparing 1,400 IU vitamin D per week to a placebo [ 38 ].

Finally, the influence of presence in the BoD of woman directors was not only negative but also only moderately significant ( p < 0.1), and only in one specification of the models.

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariable analysis ( P < .1) were entered in a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 and moderately significant at p ≤ 0.10 (although, for concision in our reporting, results discussed below are for findings at p ≤ 0.08).

born) may be protective against diabetes for Latinx people (although this finding is only moderately significant at the p < 0.10 level), in the non-Latinx population being an immigrant is statistically significantly associated with an 8.6% (OR 1.086, [95% CI, 1.009–1.169]) greater risk of reporting diabetes.

Associations and findings were considered significant at a p < 0.05 alpha level and moderately significant at p < 0.10 alpha level, where these findings are highlighted.

The difference in satisfaction with services is moderately significant ( p < 0.10).

In contrast, fixed effects do not contribute to increased prediction accuracy: directional effects from genomic inbreeding result in small and nonsignificant differences in prediction accuracy (Table S5); additive and dominance effects at high-confidence QTL in GWAS models result in large and moderately significant decreases in prediction accuracy for DTS (−0.059; P -value < 0.10; Table S6).

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P < .1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model.

Results were interpreted as moderately significant ( p -value < 0.1), significant ( p -value < 0.05), and highly significant ( p -value < 0.01).

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P <.1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model [19] .

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P < 0.1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model ( 32 ).