“near significance”

Only the detection of a non- Plasmodium pathogen was statistically significant, though a negative TAC result showed near significance (Table 3 ).

However, near significance was obtained for the state of employment, although the majority of participants for each group were working in Victoria.

3 ) and with near significance for several other measurements (i.e., IMBAV, UNLT, TOCoPCoM).

Functional patency was found to be significantly or of near significance related to five factors (Table 4 ): the number of prior TCVC (categorical and as continuous variables), the indication for an ecAVG; BMI; primary renal disease; and presence of peripheral artery disease.

Between the type of data being analyzed and the low number of participants per aircraft, the r-squared values were low, in spite of higher associations and significance or near significance.

The near significance of the age effect can probably be accounted for by the greater adult SFOAE levels between 3 and 4 kHz (which we attribute to ear canal acoustics rather than cochlear function).

In addition, there is significant improvement compared to placebo on ISLT-recognition and near significance for ISLT total score, effects that were not seen in the overall patient population.

Among the tested covariates, only the tumor grade showed near significance, with grade 3 (G3) patients associated with the worst prognosis (as expected).

The SGRQ was significantly lower in those not on antifibrotics across all domains, with a trend towards near significance in the activity domain.

Interestingly, trends near significance were identified between honey type four and honeys one and two, suggesting that honey type four may have reduced antimicrobial activity.

None of the comparisons reached statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons, though one comparison was near significance after correction, as shown in the graph.

Upon multivariate analysis, the near significance was due to variances in BMI and diabetic status of the recipients, whereas donor marijuana status was not a factor ( Table 4 ).

Across these analyses, NSD SD was mostly a significant or near-significant predictor, and NSD mean remained near significance.

In all, six genes achieved significance or near significance, defined as a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 10% or 25%, respectively (Fig. 1d ).

Also, the differences in finding undetected suspicious lesion during procurement between the control-CXR + US group and the study group was near significance.

Near significance was demonstrated using the Mann–Whitney U test for both aluminum and nitrate nitrogen (see Figure 2 ), and the lack of significance at the 95% level in these cases may be attributed to a type II error due to small sample size.

Importantly, rTMS and PAS effects in the present study were consistently present, either as a significant finding or as trends near significance in experiments 1 and 2, where 20 subjects each were studied, but became robust and unequivocal only with a group size of 38.

The score of perceived severity did not significantly differ between baseline and 3 months after the intervention; however, it was near significance level.

Other genes of interest near significance included, on Chromosome 1, a Riboflavin synthase-like gene ( RboS-L ), on Chromosome 2, a Prolyl 4-hydroxylase ( P4H1 ) gene involved in hydroxyproline synthesis, on Chromosome 3, an IAA-Ala Amino Hydrolase ( IAH ) gene involved in yielding IAA from amino acid conjugates, on Chromosome 5, a Guanosine Diphosphatase1 gene ( GDA1 ) involved in transport of GDP-Mannose into the lumen of the Golgi apparatus, on Chromosome 7, a UDP-Glu:UDP-Gal 4-epimerase gene ( UGE5 ), and, on Chromosome 10, a WRKY63-like transcription factor gene (Fig. 4 , Table 3 ).

Overall, it was concluded that Exp4 likely is not showing variant-specific conservation, but future analysis after more mutation accumulation is needed due to Exp4 showing near significance for the analysis of all sequences (see Figure 1 ). 3.5.

There was a significant interaction between evKSS8 and bedtime category, with a stronger association between evKSS8 and bedtime in early sleepers compared to late sleepers ( F (2,683) = 2.91, p = 0.055; near significance).

The “baseline” differences in lipid levels were near significance.

LVI (p-value = 0.050), PNI (p-value = 0.025), axillary lymph node involvement (p-value = 0.027), and Ki-67 (p-value = 0.018), index showed significant association with PTB on univariate logistic regression analysis, while only Ki-67 (p-value = 0.017) index showed significant association with PTB on multivariate logistic regression analysis, although PNI (p-value = 0.074) showed near significance.

48 An initial study of 8100 genes in 20 MPNSTs found no significant differences in expression profile based on NF1 status (10 NF1-related, 10 sporadic), although 6 genes showed a trend near significance, 3 genes were related to whether tumors were peripheral (on a limb) versus central (trunk/neck/head), and metastasis moderately correlated with expression of 12 genes. 49 The authors then examined 22 additional MPNSTs, and found a significant signature that differentiated 9 MPNSTs (8 NF1, 1 sporadic) from the others, characterized by higher expression of neuroglial and Schwann cell differentiation genes (e.g.

No significant difference regarding the reverberation artifact was found for models H and I and near significance was obtained for model F and L.