“near significance”

Like in pigs, the increase in the percentage of collagen was accompanied by enhanced clustering degree with correlation near significance (Rho = 0.38 and p-value = 0.059) ( Figure 3 C).

A trend for a higher mean percentage of CD8+ve/TNF-α+ve T cells was found in CP CML patients compared to controls with a near significance (P = 0.059) level and reaching a statistically significant level when compared with IM Res patients ( p =0.005).

The difference although nonsignificant was more prominent in Lequesne compared with WOMAC so that in one subscale called “activities of daily life” it was near significance level ( P = .059) in favor of PRGF.

Folic acid showed near significance (HR 0.81; p = 0.059).

No significant pairwise comparisons were found in BLSA, but the e3e3 versus e3e4 and e3e3 versus e4e4 comparisons were near significance ( P = 0.059).

On the rotarod, before KEED intervention, there were no significant effects or interactions, although the effect of epoch was near significance (two‐way RM ANOVA, epoch: F [1,23] = 3.939, p = 0.0592).

There was a significant correlation between both variables (r = 0.55, p< 0.001; Pearson) in the whole cohort, however results were different in each group: No correlation in the No BT group, r = 0.59, p< 0.001 the anti-TNF group, r = 0.79, p = 0.002 the anti-CD20 group, and near significance r = 0.50, p = 0.060 the anti-IL6R/CTLA-4 group.

In line, metabolomics showed near significance of reduced levels of tyrosine (l2fc = −0.47, adjusted p-value = 0.06), suggesting an active tyrosine catabolism.

The correlation between SKP2 protein levels and IC50 values showed a positive trend (Pearson r = 0.7767), with a p-value near significance ( p = 0.06), (Supplemental Fig.

A larger cohort however may still be needed to further solidify these findings as TPI change in the neutral varus/valgus < 10° correction group was near significance ( p = 0.06).

The effect of ROI was near significance ( F 2, 17 = 2.991, P = .06), with the highest activity within the dACC ( Fig. 7E ).

Though we failed to achieve statistical significance to the level of P < 0.05 in the diabetic group, the near significance ( P = 0.06–0.09) for the correlation of GIR and NEFA suppression to CAC volume at 6 years and to CAC progression from 0 to 6 years suggests that the relationship between insulin resistance and CAC is also present in type 1 diabetes.

But, there was a near significance in physical health suggesting that male diabetic's physical health was marginally better then female diabetics ( P value = 0.06).

The bootstrapped DRS version showed near significance ( p = 0.06), suggesting potential regional differences.

We found a positive correlation between baseline caudate volume and TTS change from baseline to 12-month measurements that was near significance (r = 0.21, p = 0.06); that is, those with a larger caudate at baseline tended to show less subsequent improvement in tic symptoms ( Table 3 , Figure 1 ).

4B , R = 0.4179, p = 0.0023), and near significance for serum cholesterol and tumor DHT ( Fig. 4C , R = 0.2613, p = 0.06).

Results obtained show that age had no significant effect on the amplitude of response, although in red conditions (600 nm) some effects od near significance was observed [ F (1, 79) = 3.51; p -value = 0.06], perhaps due to lack of power.

This analysis did not evidence other significant effects, although the effect of PPI factor was near significance [F(2,56) = 2.95, p = .06].

Central outer retinal layer thickness significantly predicted the cone threshold (β = −0.011, P = 0.009) and rod threshold (β = −0.014, P = 0.004), as did age for the rod threshold (β = 0.019, P = 0.030), but was only near significance for cone threshold (β = 0.015, P = 0.06).

However, only TUG and BERG show a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05), while TIS and paretic shoulder mobility are near significance ( p < 0.06).

Interestingly, when rare heterogeneous TT genotype was excluded from the analysis, among the light caffeine consumers, there was a near significance that TC is more PD protective than CC (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.17–1.03], p = 0.06), while in the heavy caffeine consumers, this trend was weaker (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.40–1.17], p = 0.16).

The increased spleen masses were statistically significant (n=3; p=0.009) whereas increases in length were near significance (n=3; p=0.060).

Additionally, although the main three-way interaction in NAcc changes to near significance after correction for two ROIs ( P =0.06), many of the follow-up ANOVA effects that drive this interaction do survive correction for two ROIs.

As it was significant for 9 subjects and near significance (p = 0.06) for 2 subjects, the linear regression analysis can be considered reliable.

There was near significance in cfDNA reduction of the group ( p = 0.06).