Induction of IFN-λ3 upon MERS-CoV-nsp2 expression was near significance (p=0.06) ( Figure 1D ); whereby IFN-λ3 was not impacted by MERS-CoV-nsp5 ( Figure 1D ).
← all phrases
“near significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
Analysis of these data confirms that the tumor burden in the trastuzumab only group was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than that of the trastuzumab + FUS + MBs group (mean tumor volume = 25 ± 17 mm 3 vs 8 ± 5 mm 3 ), and near significance (p = 0.06) was observed between the trastuzumab + FUS + MBs group and the control group (24 ± 7 mm 3 ).
There was near significance in cfDNA reduction of the group ( p = 0.06).
Significant differences were also found comparing relative HGS to SAD but not OLD, which was near significance ( p -value < 0.06) in Fig. 4 .
Interestingly, when rare heterogeneous TT genotype was excluded from the analysis, among the light caffeine consumers, there was a near significance that TC is more PD protective than CC (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.17–1.03], p = 0.06), while in the heavy caffeine consumers, this trend was weaker (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.40–1.17], p = 0.16).
But, there was a near significance in physical health suggesting that male diabetic's physical health was marginally better then female diabetics ( P value = 0.06).
Though we failed to achieve statistical significance to the level of P < 0.05 in the diabetic group, the near significance ( P = 0.06–0.09) for the correlation of GIR and NEFA suppression to CAC volume at 6 years and to CAC progression from 0 to 6 years suggests that the relationship between insulin resistance and CAC is also present in type 1 diabetes.
There was a significant correlation between both variables (r = 0.55, p< 0.001; Pearson) in the whole cohort, however results were different in each group: No correlation in the No BT group, r = 0.59, p< 0.001 the anti-TNF group, r = 0.79, p = 0.002 the anti-CD20 group, and near significance r = 0.50, p = 0.060 the anti-IL6R/CTLA-4 group.
By contrast, the PGLS regression of 90 var and Sensitivity ave remains significant at P = 0.029 ( Figure 4 ) and the PGLS regression of 90 var and Sensitivity max is near significance at P = 0.060.
Results obtained show that age had no significant effect on the amplitude of response, although in red conditions (600 nm) some effects od near significance was observed [ F (1, 79) = 3.51; p -value = 0.06], perhaps due to lack of power.
A similar reduction with a value quite near significance ( p = 0.06) has been found for DHA, which reduced the amount of β-sheet-rich structures by 42%, which is similar to the value found in the turbidimetric assay.
The increased spleen masses were statistically significant (n=3; p=0.009) whereas increases in length were near significance (n=3; p=0.060).
The ANCOVAs showed a significant interaction between ‘time of test’ and ‘arm length’ for the mean velocity [ F (1,14) = 15.12; p = 0.002] and for the peak velocity [ F (1,14) = 9.45; p = 0.008], and a near significance interaction between ‘time of test’ and ‘arm length’ for the mean reached positions [ F (1,14) = 4.10; p = 0.062].
Ratio had an F-value of 6.42 and p = 0.0155, whereas concentration showed a borderline effect ( p = 0.0575), and the concentration × lactose interaction was also near significance ( p = 0.0620).
On the other hand, carcinoma cases tended to have higher percentage of stromal N-cadherin expression (median value = 75) in comparison to NPH cases (median value = 70), a relation that showed near significance ( P = 0.063).
When we compared matched (only red or green) to dichoptic colored filters, the results were near significance (p = 0.063).
IL-6 levels were significantly elevated compared to controls in all groups, except for the methotrexate-treated group, where the increase was near significance ( p = 0.063).
For the group in Saudi Arabia, a single 7-day cosine model approximates these average relative daily rhythm-adjusted mean value (Midline Estimating Statistic of Rhythm, MESOR) with near significance ( P = 0.063), while a two-component model including the 3.5-day term reaches significance ( P = 0.045).
When comparing these two proportions, there was near significance (Chi-Square = 3.46, p = 0.063).
Furthermore, the GM-CSF protein concentration measured in the astrocyte culture medium was lower than that of microglial cultures in the majority of cultures compared, to near significance ( p = 0.0635).
The result is near significance ( P = 0.0638), in agreement with the low power of the method.
Table 5 shows multivariable logistic regression analysis results for NHD, which included the variable Frailty, which had near significance on univariable analysis ( P = .064).
palmeri occurs are not more similar to the native range environments than random; although for CliMond the result was near significance (p = 0.064 and p = 0.196; CliMond and PRISM respectively).
Additionally, on the day of readmission (Lag0) there was a 2.3% increased likelihood of readmission due to ozone concentration levels when adjusted for PM 2.5 (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.001–1.045, p = 0.042); however, only a near significance was seen between readmission and ozone concentration Lag0 when not adjusted for PM 2.5 (single-pollutant model) (OR 1.020, (95%CI 0.999–1.041) p = 0.064 [ 12 ].
The difference in the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) was near significance level ( p = 0.064), with a higher prevalence of MDD in the NSSI group.