“nearly significant”

Notably, nearly significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.1) are indicated in the figures.

This difference was nearly significant (0.05<p<0.1).

Table 3 also reports the c parameter estimated for each group: the direct path was not significant in the Pre-Lockdown group, nearly significant in the Lockdown group ( p < 0.10), and significant in the After-Lockdown group ( p < 0.01).

Univariate analyses were performed first; all variables with nearly significant contributions ( p < 0.1) at univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis, alongside age and sex.

However, we found three nearly significant (uncorrected p < 0.1) cases during N2 stage ( Fig. 3a ).

The model included all significant ( p ≤ 0.05) or nearly significant ( p < 0.10) variables identified in the univariate analysis.

If the main effects or interactions were significant ( P ≤ 0.05) or nearly significant (0.05 < P ≤ 0.1) in the models, the Bonferroni correction post-hoc test was applied for pairwise comparisons.

Medical personnel reported a nearly significant 20% increase in comfort conducting a sexual history ( p = .10).

Risk-scoring for risk of having FoF was defined by calculating the sum of statistically significant or nearly significant ( p < 0.10) variables in the multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses (female gender, having a cognitive disorder diagnosed pre-fracture, at least four medications, orthostatic hypotension, BADL ≤ 5, IADL ≤ 7, GDS-15 7-15, abnormal TUG and/or living alone).

All variables which turned out to be significant or nearly significant ( p < 0.1) determinants of ODD on the univariate analysis, were included in a single multivariate logistic regression model.

Possible significant, nearly significant ( P < .1) and clinically important confounding factors were identified from background information, delivery characteristics, and intervention data.

Dicamba drift exposure led to a nearly significant reduction in the total number of flowers produced over the experiment (treatment effect, χ 1 2 = 2.68, P = 0.10; Table S4 ) with S. spinosa, I. hederacea , and D. carota exhibiting significantly fewer flowers in the presence of dicamba (species × treatment effect, χ 8 2 = 6.18, P < 0.001; Table S4 , see Fig.

In addition, there were 2 biomarkers of interest with nearly significant ( p < 0.10) alterations during the disease state: IL-31 (mean of 104 vs. 67 pg/mL; p = 0.0517) and IL-27 (mean of 2129 vs. 1542 pg/mL; p = 0.0754).

Carriers appeared to be at greater risk of asthma compared to Low IRT controls, with a nearly significant adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of 1.29 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.69; p < 0.1).

This analysis identified a region in RNASE3 (nucleotides 776–950) that exhibited a nearly significant departure from 0 in the Ghanaians population (D = 1.80; p <0.1), indicating that frequency-dependent selection was operating at the c.371G>C SNP.

Lung function–PM analysis Although none of the lung function metrics showed associations below the p < 0.05 significance threshold with any of the exposure variables evaluated in the mixed model, several relationships were nearly significant ( p < 0.10) for decreased lung function versus increased personal pollution exposure ( Table 2 ).

To avoid missing potentially relevant predictive factors, variables that were nearly significant ( p < 0.1) in univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analysis using forward LR selection to identify the independent predictors of 30-day mortality and a poor 6-month prognosis.

In the control group, however, subjects developing diabetes had sustained a mean weight gain of 1.8 ± 3.3 kg, whereas those remaining diabetes-free had an average weight loss of 1.1 ± 4.4 kg, a nearly significant difference ( P = 0.10).

Significant ( p < 0.05) or nearly significant factors ( p < 0.1) in bivariate analysis were chosen as potential risk factors for complications.

We performed Tukey's post hoc tests in the package multcomp (Hothorn, Bretz, & Westfall, 2008 ) to separate means for significant ( p < 0.05) or nearly significant ( p < 0.1) herbivory treatment by patch type interaction effects.

In terms of support-seeking behavior, students who sought support scored higher (M = 6.63, SD = 0.839) compared to students who did not seek support (M = 6.0, SD = 1.941) but it was nearly significant (F = 2.716, p = 0.101) Family mental health was not statistically significant (F = 1.93, p = 0.165). 4.7.

Of note is the nearly significant elevation in mean SmO 2 resat from Sept-Nov (MD = 0.21, SEE = 0.10, df = 15.0, t = 2.19, p = 0.105) that preceded this significant decline.

In male whippets, we also observed a highly significant difference in neck girth ( p ≈ 0.0013, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and nearly significant difference in chest girth ( p ≈ 0.11, Wilcoxon rank sum test) among wild type (+/+) and heterozygotes ( mh/ +).

Cell-attached units had nearly significant lower baseline firing rates (mean 5.1 vs. 13.2 Hz, p = 0.11), and significantly better spike-triggered decoding of pole position (0.658 vs. 0.602; p = 0.012).

On the lowland Webster soil, the main treatment was nearly significant ( P = 0.11).