Barely Significant
← all phrases

“not quite significant”

649 sentences · 649 papers · 6,904 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=.11p=0.118

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Many of the associations remained similar between the two time periods, however, some showed changes such as the vaccination rate which was first positive (IRR: 1.23, p : 0.8), when barely any full vaccinations were performed, then negative one year later, although still not quite significant (IRR: 0.83, p : 0.07).
Zinc gives a coefficient not quite significant at I in 20 level (0-379) and this might be meaningful in view of the evidence for a connection between its concentration in soil and the incidence of cancer of the stomach (Stocks and Davies, 1960).
3 , 12 , 17 , 18 In a small pilot study we also observed that the LRRK2- p.Q1111H SNP, which is common in some Latin American populations, occurred at an increased frequency in PD patients, though the difference was not quite significant. 19 Thus, whether this variant represents a PD risk factor in Latino populations remains unclear.
In the COU-AA trial of prednisone alone or in combination with abiraterone, there was a small increase in abnormal liver function tests, with the number of patients with increased AST and ALT doubling from, respectively, 5% and 4.8% of patients with prednisone alone to 13.3% and 12% in patients with prednisone and abiraterone, albeit this involved a small number of patients and the effect was not quite significant [ 140 , 141 ].
Analogously, for α at occipital sensors, there were main effects of spatial attention [lower α for contralateral attention, F (1,12) = 22.50, P < 0.01] and of attended modality [lower α now when vision was task-relevant, F (1,12) = 15.60, P < 0.01] and a trend for an interaction [ F (1,12) = 4.28, P = 0.06] that was not quite significant.
9/13 16/20 35% 69% 80% A x2 test on the figures in Table III showed that the incidence of breast tumours in mice with C57B1 ovaries was significantly lower than in those with C57B1/IF ovaries (P < 0.01), but the difference between those with C57B1 and IF ovaries was not quite significant (P about 0m065).
It is possible that since our ancestral strain (PA14) has a propensity to produce biofilms (and we find putative mutations upregulating biofilm formation in the c-GMP pathway in our evolved metapopulations), our estimates of OD in exponential phase are more variable than they might otherwise be, which could explain why the statistical tests are close to but not quite significant.