Barely Significant
← all phrases

not quite significant

654 sentences · 654 papers · 6,904 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=.11p=0.118

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

As seen in Table 2 , neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (as operationalized collectively via the ADI, the COI, and informant‐reports of the Extent of Neighborhood Problems) exhibited a small, but not quite significant association with parenting overall (the median p value was .049 and the average Z‐score was 2.11, but the 95% confidence intervals were slightly lower than zero).
Suggested bimodality at the beginning of the twenty-first century is not quite significant (p-value 0.27), although this might be caused by the fact that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\sigma }_{P}$$\end{document} σ P is still negative during the first years of the twenty-first century.
In Schatzker types II or III fracture treatment, some scholars have found differences in clinical results in favor of ARIF management; however, these differences were not quite significant. 18 , 31 , 34 , 36 Moreover, no significant differences in clinical outcome were found between the ARIF and ORIF groups.
However, in view of the GGA potential it is not quite significant to establish a desirable band gaps of these alloys due to the involvement of localised f- electrons which commonly hindrances to predict the intimate electronic band structures of these alloys.
There was 37% mean increase in GFR in remaining kidney noted in group A and 47% increase in group B although the results of correlation were not quite significant in both groups.
Abstracts
Indian J Nucl Med · 2023 · PMC10798254
Positive Mood As expected, in the not debriefed yet conditions, participants reported less positive mood after ostracism ( M = 2.67, SD = 0.95) than after inclusion ( M = 3.17, SD = 0.85), t (44.83) = -1.90, p = .064, d = −0.55, although this effect was not quite significant in a two-tailed analysis.