“not quite significant”

Although experimental variability meant that the effect was not quite significant ( P = 0.056), the effect size was large (fivefold increase).

While not quite significant ( P = 0.056), this observation implies one of two things.

While the Kaplan–Meier statistic for this table is not quite significant (χ 2 = 3.65, df = 1, p = 0.056), it is also clear that the improved mortality for the Runx1p66 group begins at about 15 days, and then persists from then on.

There was a suggestion that dragonfly host species influenced the overall composition of the microbiome in nymphs, but this was not quite significant ( Figure 2 e; ANOSIM p = 0.056).

Comparison of the 3 respective pre-test responses demonstrated an increase in the magnitude of the IL-10 response, particularly with regards to ST1 and ST2, but this trend was not quite significant ( Fig. 3 , p = 0.0562).

Furthermore, direct comparison of the diseased tissues shows that these two cytokines are reciprocally expressed, although the increase (x1.55 fold) of IFNγ in paucibacillary ileum is not quite significant (p = 0.057).

At stage 26, mitotic cells comprised 1.63 ± 0.51% of otic epithelial cells with a slight but not quite significant increase to 2.6 ± 0.39% at stage 35 ( p = 0.057, t -test, Supplementary Table 1 ).

One-sample t -tests revealed that only the area TE2 scores appeared to be below chance in the control hemisphere, but this effect was not quite significant ( t 8 = 2.22, p = 0.057).

sylvaticus was not quite significant (4.68, p = 0.057).

Generally the non-dominant (left) eye tended to have larger isoline contour areas (average ISOA across all subjects and all binocular conditions = 83.18 minarc 2 ), which means that fixation was less stable in that eye than in the dominant (right) eye (average ISOA = 54.11 minarc 2 ), but this trend was not quite significant (repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), F (2, 3) = 6.98, p = 0.057).

The main effect of day was not quite significant ( F 5,145 = 2.453, P = 0.057), and there was no group by day interaction ( F 15,145 = 1.366, P = 0.202).

In the Indonesian sample, the carers’ education levels were positively related to the child attending private school (education levels rs ≥ .715, P < .001), although the relationship between household income and attending private school was not quite significant (r s = .325, P = .057).

We observed an increase in the nuclear, but not the cytoplasmic IHC staining for MAT1A (Mean: 0.966 ± 0.42) compared to those whose prior treatment status was listed as “not reported” (Mean: 0.6468 ± 0.3568) or those previously treated with BCG (Mean: 0.6475 ± 0.454); this difference was not quite significant ( p = 0.0572), likely due to insufficient statistical power from a limited sample size ( Figure 3 C).

On the other hand, the cambinol-treated mice exhibited a not quite significant difference in the number of bacterial CFUs expressed in the log10 per gram of the liver ( p = 0.0575; 5.60 ± 0.601 vs. 4.596 ± 0.213) but, interestingly, did exhibit a significantly higher amount of bacterial proliferation in the spleens (6.751 ± 0.168 vs. 5.870 ± 0.3147) as compared with the control group ( Figure 3 B). 3.4.

This correlated with a decrease in protein expression of the peptide in the SCI group; however, this was not quite significant ( p = 0.0578; 75% of the sham group, Fig. 2 d).

At mid-interbout the interaction was not quite significant (P = 0.058, F = 2.320).

Bleomycin alone increased lung hydroxyproline content by 100%, this increase was reduced by 30% with CDDO-Me treatment, although the results were not quite significant (p = 0.058) ( Fig. 4D ).

In the FC, while the O 3 –diet interaction was not quite significant (F 2,24 = 3.21, p = 0.058), the O 3 -exposed regular diet group had higher NQO1 activity than the exposed FAT group ( p < 0.05).

The difference was not quite significant for the continuously varying MHI-5 scores either (p = 0.058 in t-test and p = 0.064 for Kruskal-Wallis test), but the continuous ISI scores at the last follow up were still statistically significantly higher for the early frontline employees than for the non-frontline employees (6.82 vs. 5.51; p = 0.001 in t-test and p = 0.001 in Kruskal-Wallis test).

The significant interaction was due to a slightly rightwards AQ for the small group of female PWS but this difference was not quite significant compared with the AQ for the female controls ( p = 0.058) and the AQs for the two male groups did not differ significantly either ( p = 0.102) (see Fig. 4 ). 3.1.3.

When NetAB females were mated to NetAB or wild type males the reduction in egg-laying observed was not quite significant (p=0.058, Student’s t-test, Figure 7C ).

6.6%, p = 0.0035) and not quite significant RABGAP1L (9.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.0587).

There was also a trend for PND 8 pups to cease calling more quickly than PND 4 pups during prolonged maternal separation; however, the difference was not quite significant (t = 2.33 , d.f. = 6, p = 0.059).

There was also a preference for the shade versus the middle area, but this difference was not quite significant ( P = 0.059).

Seminiferous tubule diameter tended to be smaller in stress-treated versus control bats (group means were found to be 109.14 μm and 148.08 μm, respectively), although the difference was not quite significant ( P =0.059, d.f.=5.0273, t =2.4223, r =1.46; Fig. 3D ,E).