Barely Significant
← all phrases

of borderline significance

1,255 sentences · 1,255 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

of borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Overall, at the latest assessment, the proportion of participants with VF was significantly higher in the P-HIV group than in the A-HIV group, and in all strata of infection duration except the (6–12 years) group, where the percentage of VF was low, and the (25–32 years) group where the difference was of borderline significance (p = 0.06) ( Fig. 2 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
However, although there was a statistically significant further decline in depressive symptoms as measured by the MADRAS when the eight participants were included in the analysis [ F (1, 7) = 7.692; p = 0.028], the decline on the MADRAS was only of borderline significance when only the seven completers were included [ F (1, 6) = 5.250; p = 0.062].
of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
In subgroup analyses, Beijing strains only had a significant association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (aOR 6.1; 1.2–30.4), and an association of borderline significance with polyresistant tuberculosis (aOR 1.8; 1.0–3.5; p = 0.062), among individuals born in the Western Pacific.
of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
In the sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with angiographically verified coronary status (CAG group, n = 94), the overlap-weighted association between CAD and mortality was greater and of borderline significance (weighted HR 2.99, 95% CI 0.95–9.47; p = 0.062, Figure 4 ). 4.
of borderline significanceP = 0.06221.2× alpha
The associations between per 2-fold increases in circulating levels of C16:0 and C18:0 with risk of incident AD were of borderline significance with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.6 (1.0–2.6) ( P = 0.0622) and 1.6 (0.9–2.7) ( P = 0.0926), respectively.
of borderline significanceP = 0.0631.3× alpha
The results of the dichotomous analysis indicated that the relative changes in TNF-α concentrations were statistically different between the two groups, with less increase and more decrease in the supplemented group (P = 0.018) ( Figure 3 ), while the change in IL-1 was of borderline significance (P = 0.063), with more increase and less decrease in the values in the supplemented group.