Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Although evidence suggests indoor pollution is an important risk factor for obstructive lung disease [ 31 ], in this study, the association between unclean cooking fuel use and obstructive lung disease was only marginally significant and was further attenuated after adjustment for smoking status.
Moreover, we removed the word ‘significantly’ in one of the sentences because one of correlations ( P = 0.06) is only marginally significant, whilst the other speaks for itself, remaining highly significant after recalculation. “ As all populations were assumed to have started with a small founder group of a single or very few nests, the present size of a population was also expected to be an indicator of age and both were indeed highly correlated (Pearson correlation, n = 14, r = − 0.849, P = 0.0001; see Table 1 for details).
Our results for each parameter revealed significant differences between the two reading modes (except for an only marginally significant difference for the percentage of regressions); (ii) articulation during oral reading negatively influenced the intraindividual consistency of reading performances with regard to a significant number of eye movement parameters; (iii) reading skills assessed by the LGVT reliably predicted spatial and temporal characteristics of forward eye movements, but not regressions when reading silently.
When the whole group of patients was evaluated, the choice of chemotherapy (VMCP or CP) was not a significant prognostic factor associated with response or survival by uni‐ or multivariate analysis, and the difference between the survival curves of the treatment groups was only marginally significant.
Finally, while the interaction between agent judgment and dilemma type was only marginally significant, we looked at simple effects regardless and found that across both consequentialist and non-consequentialist participants, people were more likely to cooperate with the non-consequentialist (73%) than the consequentialist agent (57%) in the sacrificial dilemma, x 2 (1) = 6.73, p = .009.
Finally, the evidence that endogenous GH plays no role in sex differences in muscle mass and function is supported by evidence from the most extensive interventional study of GH treatment to non-GH–deficient adults, daily GH administration for 8 weeks to healthy recreational athletes produced only marginally significant improvement in exercise performance of men and none in women ( 174 ).