The effect was however, only marginally significant for the proportion of calf slaughter (P = 0.048) and not significant for calf body mass (P = 0.066).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
This is in line with the larger genetic diversity observed in AFR [ 34 , 41 ], but the difference in SNP-based heritability estimates was only marginally significant ( P = 0.048).
We found that although the median values remained identical, the difference now was only marginally significant ( p = 0.048, mean values is now lower for pan-stress DoGs, 57.1, and 63.8 for non-DoG genes.
The estimates of λ for leaf P and C : P were only marginally significant ( P < 0.048), whereas leaf C and N : P showed no significant phylogenetic signal ( P > 0.556).
Consequently, the findings suggested that the positive effect of abusive supervision at T1 on emotional exhaustion at T2 was stronger at lower levels of self-compassion ( β = 0.488; p = 0.000), moderate at medium levels of self-compassion ( β = 0.344; p = 0.000), and weaker (only marginally significant) at higher levels of self-compassion at T1 ( β = 0.156; p = 0.049).
HIV diversification in the ENV3 region was lower among men who had ARV drugs detected at enrollment compared to men who did not have ARV drugs detected; however, this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049).
Permutation testing for the pairwise comparisons showed that the number of overlaps was within the range expected by chance in the case of SZ (z-score = −0.59, p = 0.216; Figure S2d ) and ASD (z-score = 2.61, p = 0.062; Figure S2f ), and only marginally significant in the case of WS (z-score = 3.75, p = 0.049; Figure S2e ).
The difference between CON + SAL and KA + MI was only marginally significant (T = 2.23, p = 0.049, DF = 10), whereas the difference between the KA + MI and KA + SAL groups was not significant on 2-tailed test (T = 2.19, p = 0.053, DF = 10).
8 In the FREEDOM study, the benefit with CABG over PCI for all-cause death at 5 years was only marginally significant ( P = 0.049), 4 however, considering that the trial was not powered for all-cause death, this result could be considered hypothesis-generating. 15 In the FREEDOM Follow-On study, 16 which extended follow-up in 943 of the original 1900 patients cohort, the estimated rate of mortality at 8 years was 23.7% and 18.7% in the PCI-DES and CABG group, respectively (unadjusted HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.78, P = 0.076), with the HR remaining unchanged after adjustment.
JA in infected Col-0 at 8 h was lower than in C24 at 8 h, reflecting the delay in the response in Col-0, although the difference was only marginally significant ( t -test, p = 0.049).
For the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (ESS) the H -test was not significant and for the PI it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049).
The association of parental educational status and prevalent HTN was not significant in the analysis of subjects with age 40–59 years, and was only marginally significant ( P = 0.049) in the analysis of subjects with age 60–80 years.
No significant difference was observed concerning the patient body index mass ( p = 0.384), blood group ( p = 0.403), presentation ( p = 0.322), AVM size ( p = 0.585), grading ( p = 0.403), location ( p = 0.944), hemorrhage ( p = 0.629), duration of surgery ( p = 0.756), blood loss ( p = 0.237), arterial blood supply ( p = 0.099), recurrent rate ( p = 0.706), or follow-up ( p = 0.677), and the difference in duration of hospital stay was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049).
Are studies with broader conclusions associated with higher citation impact ? Overall, generalized articles ( Mean rank = 279.27) were associated with higher impact (normalized citation count) than restricted articles ( Mean rank = 252.90), although the difference was only marginally significant ( U = 31843.00, z =—1.97, p = 0.049, r =—0.10).
Our data also suggest that the subjects who expect a higher response to the action M are more likely to be hump-shaped contributors, however this result is only marginally significant (p-value = 0.049).
Overall differences in genotype distribution between the sexes in the field were only marginally significant ( χ 2 = 6.014, df = 2, p = 0.049) for the common genotypes A, B and C.
The link with reduced depressive symptoms in the HT group was only marginally significant (p=0.049) and should be interpreted with caution, especially given the study’s cross-sectional design and limited sample size.
In our data, however, the APCE –DOP relationship was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049; Table 6 ), so we have regarded this link as supportive rather than conclusive.
Although individuals with DKD tended to be older compared to those without the condition, the difference in age was only marginally significant ( P = 0.049).
Correlation between morphologic (MR and CT) and metabolic (PET) scores The bronchiectasis score, as calculated on both HRCT and MR, significantly correlated with the PET MIV ( p = 0.03, r s =0.56 [95%CI 0.08 to 0.83] and p = 0.009, r s =0.64 [95%CI 0.19 to 0.86] respectively), while the correlation with the PET SUV mean was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049, r s =0.5 [95%CI −0.008 to 0.86] and p = 0.06, r s =0.49 [95%CI −0.03 to 0.80] respectively) Tree-in-bud score, as calculated on HRCT but not on MR scans, significantly correlated with MIV ( p = 0.03, r s =0.56 [95%CI 0.07 to 0.83]).
In both univariate and multivariable models, males are less likely to be seropositive than females, but the effect is only marginally significant (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.51–1.00, p = 0.049).
Thus, a similar effect of age at onset was observed for ADL progression ( figure 5B ) as for SARA, although it was less marked, being only detected when comparing patients with onset before age 8 years with those with onset at age 8 years or later, and only marginally significant ( p = 0.049).
Perceived effectiveness of PHW labels by sex, educational level, and income Label 8 (pregnant woman) was the only label for which ratings differed by sex ( P = .009)—women found it more effective than men—or by educational level, and even then only marginally significant ( P = .049).
However, change of “non-reactivity” was only marginally significant ( p = .049) in the ITT analysis and not significant in the per protocol analysis.
After adjusting for confounding factors, methadone-exposed children had increased odds of educational delay, but this was only marginally significant (OR = 3.62, [1.01–13.01], p = .049).