Escape behavior measured as the proportion of larvae climbing out of the media during anoxic exposure also varied greatly, ranging from 13.3–88.3%; climbing was only marginally significant with a low correlation ( r = 0.16, P = 0.047, Figure S1)).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
However, the correlation was only marginally significant ( p = 0.047, r = −0.33) revealing that other factors are likely to play a role in individual differences.
Moreover, the minimal reduction in HIT-6 score in responders at D2 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.047).
For the spatio-temporal gait parameters, only marginally significant differences were found for stride time (p = 0.047) and swing time (p = 0.033).
The interaction was only marginally significant for men who migrated to Sweden for all other reasons (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00, 1.36, p value = 0.047).
There were only marginally significant differences between d-LAA/c-LA and a-LAA/c-LA ( p = 0.047).
However, our analysis revealed that problem-focused coping was only marginally significant ( p = 0.047) in moderating the association between COVID-19 perseverative cognition and depression.
The comparison between adults with BPD and those with ASD was only marginally significant ( d = 0.51, p = 0.047), and not significant when the analysis was repeated in a random subsample.
Although only marginally significant in Chinese (rs7088318, OR = 1.23, P = 0.047), the PIP4K2A association also showed consistency across populations.
Assaying 25 μM NAD + with 80, 120, 160 and 200 μg/ml ADH, we found ADH concentration (mg/ml) and V mean to have a weak and only marginally significant relationship ( V mean = 379+0.558[ADH], p = 0.047, n = 8). 65°C Incubation for 30 Minutes is not Sufficient to Fully Degrade NAD + Thirty minutes of 65°C incubation was shown to degrade NAD + while keeping NADH intact [24] , as NAD + has a higher temperature dependent degradation rate than NADH at pH around 7.0 [24] .
Post hoc comparison with the Games-Howell test between the NC and BPD groups yielded a significant p value of 0.014 (Cohen’s d = 1.08), however, the difference between the BPD and the ASC group was only marginally significant (p = 0.047; Cohen’s d = 0.51).
A higher dew point means a lower minimum temperature requirement for dew formation, while a lower gap indicates an increased likelihood of dew formation; however, this was only marginally significant when considering 3 pm dew point and maximum air temperature ( p -value = 0.047). 4.
Sulfate and DO showed a similar pattern to pH (non-significantly lower in lakes with few water lilies and even lower in lakes with many water lilies) although the effect of many water lilies was only marginally significant ( p = 0.047 and 0.036, respectively) and the overall effect of lilies was not significant.
Both the DASH diet and MIND diet score demonstrated an association with systolic blood pressure (SBP), although the association between the DASH diet and SBP was only marginally significant, the MIND diet had a significant association with SBP (OR = 1.012 (CI 95%=1.000- 1.025) P value = 0.048, and OR = 1.097 (CI 95%=1.037–1.159) P value = 0.001 respectively).
Comparing genetic and epidemiological relationships between breakdowns An analysis of the association between close spatial proximity among breakdowns (2 km and 5 km) and genetic similarity gave only marginally significant results ( p = 0.048) for distances of under 2 km, and showed no significance for distances of under 5 km ( Fig. 4 ).
Light coated sheep had slightly lower vD 2 concentrations of −0.67 nmol L –1 (±0.34 SE ) compared to dark coated sheep although this association was only marginally significant (Table S3 , p = .048).
Using simple effects, MFCA preferred the ghost-nominated vehicle in the levodopa condition (b = 0.15, F(1,240) = 15.45, p < 0.001), while the same effect was only marginally significant in the placebo condition (b = 0.05, F(1,240) = 2.77, one-sided p = 0.048).
The interaction between harassment and post-copulatory courtship was marginally non-significant ( F 1,192 = 3.86, p = 0.051), and there was no effect of post-copulatory courtship on sex ratio in the control conditions (NPC versus PC: pairwise F 1,90 = 0.17, p = 0.68). Females observed to re-mate with the first male that courted them (under harassment) laid a less female-biased sex ratio than females that resisted (although this was only marginally significant: F 1,84 = 4.02, p = 0.048; figure 2 ).
The difference between the high-Fun Seeking and BD groups was attenuated and only marginally significant ( p = 0.048).
1B ), although this relationship was only marginally significant in gaps ( P = 0.048) and non-significant according to PGLS ( Table 4 ).
The effect was however, only marginally significant for the proportion of calf slaughter (P = 0.048) and not significant for calf body mass (P = 0.066).
When tidal sites were considered separately, downstream accumulation of diversity was seen only for R (Figure 3A ), and even that was only marginally significant ( p = 0.048).
The estimates of λ for leaf P and C : P were only marginally significant ( P < 0.048), whereas leaf C and N : P showed no significant phylogenetic signal ( P > 0.556).
When a logistic regression model was fit controlling for BMI, gestational age, and maternal age; fetal fraction was only marginally significant (P=0.048) and the confidence interval for the odds ratio nearly covered 1.0.
We found that although the median values remained identical, the difference now was only marginally significant ( p = 0.048, mean values is now lower for pan-stress DoGs, 57.1, and 63.8 for non-DoG genes.