Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,086 sentences · 5,086 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
Assaying 25 μM NAD + with 80, 120, 160 and 200 μg/ml ADH, we found ADH concentration (mg/ml) and V mean to have a weak and only marginally significant relationship ( V mean = 379+0.558[ADH], p = 0.047, n = 8). 65°C Incubation for 30 Minutes is not Sufficient to Fully Degrade NAD + Thirty minutes of 65°C incubation was shown to degrade NAD + while keeping NADH intact [24] , as NAD + has a higher temperature dependent degradation rate than NADH at pH around 7.0 [24] .
only marginally significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
Sulfate and DO showed a similar pattern to pH (non-significantly lower in lakes with few water lilies and even lower in lakes with many water lilies) although the effect of many water lilies was only marginally significant ( p = 0.047 and 0.036, respectively) and the overall effect of lilies was not significant.
only marginally significantP value = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Both the DASH diet and MIND diet score demonstrated an association with systolic blood pressure (SBP), although the association between the DASH diet and SBP was only marginally significant, the MIND diet had a significant association with SBP (OR = 1.012 (CI 95%=1.000- 1.025) P value = 0.048, and OR = 1.097 (CI 95%=1.037–1.159) P value = 0.001 respectively).
only marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Comparing genetic and epidemiological relationships between breakdowns An analysis of the association between close spatial proximity among breakdowns (2 km and 5 km) and genetic similarity gave only marginally significant results ( p = 0.048) for distances of under 2 km, and showed no significance for distances of under 5 km ( Fig. 4 ).
only marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
The interaction between harassment and post-copulatory courtship was marginally non-significant ( F 1,192 = 3.86, p = 0.051), and there was no effect of post-copulatory courtship on sex ratio in the control conditions (NPC versus PC: pairwise F 1,90 = 0.17, p = 0.68). Females observed to re-mate with the first male that courted them (under harassment) laid a less female-biased sex ratio than females that resisted (although this was only marginally significant: F 1,84 = 4.02, p = 0.048; figure 2 ).