Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,086 sentences · 5,086 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantP = .051.0× alphagold
When compared with baseline, the increase in telomerase activity in the intervention group after 22 weeks was only marginally significant ( d , 0.13; 95% CI, 0.001-0.27; P = .05), whereas the mean change in the wait-list control group was not statistically significant ( d , −0.03; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.10; P = .64).
only marginally significantp < .051.0× alphagold
Figure 2 C illustrates that this was indeed the case: for IDDs the correlation between DST scores in the two languages was highly significant (Pearson: r = .60, p < .001, Spearman r = .61, p < .001), whereas for controls it was not (Pearson: r = .25, p = .179, Spearman r = .27, p = .151; though the group difference between the strength of the correlations was only marginally significant: Fishers Z-test, z = 1.64, one-sided p < .05; Fig. 2 C; Lenhard & Lenhard, 2014 ).
only marginally significantp= 0.051.0× alphagold
29 However, another study done in Dschang, West Region, Cameroon cites that long distance from the health care facility is only marginally significant (p= 0.05). 30 Hence, the major risk factor associated with incomplete immunization of children after statistically controlling all other risk factors was absence of Lady Health Worker in the area.
only marginally significantp = .051.0× alphagold
The best (but not significant) models with multiple traits based on AIC were a model containing shape PC axes 4–6, in which PC4 and PC6 had only marginally significant effects ( p = .05 and p = .06 before FDR correction), and a model containing EyL, LJL, and ML, in which ML (a nontransgressive trait) had an only marginally significant effect ( p = .08 before FDR correction) (see Table S3 ).
only marginally significantp = 0.05 − 01.0× alphagold
roxellana Host gender showed only marginally significant effects on the gut microbial alpha- and beta-diversity ( p = 0.05 − 0.1 in two-way PERMANOVA; Fig. 5 a − b and S3 a − c), while host age was significantly associated with gut microbial diversity indices ( p < 0.05 in both one-way and two-way PERMANOVA; Fig. 5 c − d and S3 d − f).