“only marginally significant”

Analysis of physical examination findings by age revealed that conjunctivitis was more common in older age groups ( p = 0.012), while shiner findings were more prevalent in younger age groups ( p = 0.002). The relationship between asthma presence and rhinitis findings showed that the frequency of asthma increased with age, though this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

Kallikreins KLK1, KLK10, and KLK14 were not sexually dimorphic whilst KLK13 was female biased but only marginally significant (p = 0.054) because it was detected only in three females.

Only marginally significant differences ( P = 0.054) between PrL and IL pyramidal discharge values in Scn1a +/A1783V (PFC) mice were found, which disappeared when individual data were averaged per mouse (two-way ANOVA for individual data: genotype effect P < 0.0001; area effect not significant; interaction not significant; two-way ANOVA for mean discharge values per each mouse: genotype effect P < 0.0001; area effect not significant; interaction not significant) ( Fig. 3E and F ).

The total effects of first-generation status on satisfaction with studying were considerably lower and only marginally significant at time point two (β total = –0.09; p = 0.054) or even nonsignificant time point three (β total = –0.05; p = 0.203).

Familiar partner recognition by males There were significant differences in TF rates of males among trials (repeated measures GLM, F 3,27 = 3.95, P = 0.018) and between treatments ( F 1,9 = 28.69, P < 0.0005) but the interaction between trial and treatment was only marginally significant ( F 3,27 = 2.89, P = 0.054).

However, subsequent analysis of the final model indicated that while age of diagnosis (HR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) was significant (p<0.05), cluster ID (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.00) was only marginally significant (p=0.054).

Per-capita PMI spending was also associated with a modest increase in artemisinin-based combination therapy coverage (3.56 percentage point increase, 95% CI −0.07–7.19), though this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

When the variances of these distributions were compared by using an F-test , the analysis showed that the difference between beta-based and HFO-based border prediction was only marginally significant [ F (1, 2) = 2.42, p = 0.054] while there was no statistically significant difference between the variance of individual sub-band powers (beta and HFO) and fused power [ F (1, 3) = 2.26, p = 0.075; F (2, 3) = 0.94, p = 0.88, respectively].

Multivariate analysis showed that NTR was a significant influencing factor for OS (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.06–8.48, P = 0.038) and LPFS (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.27–7.50, P = 0.013), while only marginally significant for DMFS (HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.99–3.42, P = 0.054) Table 2 .

However, when the TMB data were adjusted for maximum allele frequency (max AF), only marginally significant differences in TMB levels were observed between the two groups (P=0.0542).

Instead, the observed variation in V̇ O 2 max appeared to be associated with variation in heart rate, which was also significantly affected by inspired P O 2 (P < 0.0001), though the effect of genotype was only marginally significant (P = 0.0545; Additional file 5 : Fig.

The control group also reached significance in the English-to-Chinese direction ( d = 0.64), but only marginally significant in the Chinese-to-English direction ( p = 0.055).

Indeed, when allelic richness was compared without CapIsr, the difference between populations disappeared (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ 2 = 4.745, df = 9, P = 0.856), and the difference between habitat types became only marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ 2 = 5.804, df = 2, P = 0.055).

The median age of assemblage A cases (47.5 years [range, 1 to 94 years]) was higher than that of assemblage B cases (37 years [range, 1 to 79 years]), but the difference was only marginally significant (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.055) ( Fig. 2 ).

In contrast, the deductible coefficient was weak and only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

As already reported by several previous studies [8] , [13] , we also observed a similar functional connectivity between face- and voice sensitive areas for normal participants, although the results were only marginally significant ( p = 0.055 FWE corrected for ROI; Fig. 4C ).

S1a), even though the difference in LA between treatments within ANRi plants was statistically only marginally significant ( P = 0.055).

Model U2 includes education and the negative coefficient of baseline CMR remains significant with a reduced magnitude ( b = −0.16, p = .003), but the negative coefficient of CMR increase is only marginally significant ( b = −0.10, p = .055), indicating that education explains part of the variance that was previously explained by CMR level and change.

At the wettest site (Pretoriuskop) grass biomass below tree canopies increased with tree height but that relationship was only marginally significant (adjusted R 2 = 10.2%, p = 0.055; Figure 2d ).

However, the interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 66) = 3.80, p = 0.055.

After controlling for the covariates (age, education, area, safety knowledge and behavioral risk score), acute pesticide poisoning was 70% more likely to occur among female than among male applicators (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.99-2.91), but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.055).

The negative relation between available play space and minutes of LPA was only marginally significant (β = −0.162 ± 0.085; p = 0.055).

32%) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

Respondents reporting the highest level of discrimination and othering acts (experienced stigma) had 2.2 times the odds (95% CI 1.0–4.7) of avoiding or delaying general health services in the fully adjusted model, but the association was only marginally significant (p=0.055).

Parents showed a significant decrease in days of opioid use over time ( β : −0.34, p < .05) and were more likely to report total past-month abstinence from all drugs ( β : −0.06), but the difference was only marginally significant for past-month opioid abstinence ( β : −1.45; p = 0.055) ( Schaeffer et al., 2021 ). 3.4.