“only marginally significant”

This effect was reversed for the recognition task, although this was only marginally significant ( t 15 = 2.05, P = 0.058).

The model at Step 2 made a significant additional contribution (∆ R 2 = .27, p < .001), with all three working memory measures uniquely predicting task performance (although note that Corsi was only marginally significant at p = .058), FDR: β = .28, t (80) = 2.58, p < .05; BDR: β = .29, t (80) = 2.69, p < .05; Corsi: β = .20, t (80) = 1.92, p = .058.

The Speech Category x Test interaction was only marginally significant [ F (2, 32) = 3.11, p = 0.058, η 2 p = 0.16].

The windowed thresholding procedure revealed that in lower densities (stronger correlation) [0.22∶0.02∶0.3], the small-world indices ΔSW HQS was significantly different between groups (p<0.05) while ΔSW TOP and ΔCC TOP were only marginally significant (p = .058 and 0.05, respectively).

Follow-up analyses over the midline revealed that the context x consistency interaction was only marginally significant at electrode Pz, F (1.7, 81.0) = 3.09, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.06.

In a multiple linear regression analysis, higher temperature ( β = − 0.23, p < 0.05) in the vasospasm phase independently predicted lower rate of MD ischemia after adjustment for age and WFNS grade (Table 4 ), although the regression was only marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

As predicted, memory was better for the High PE than Baseline condition, but statistical comparisons revealed only marginally significant differences t (23) = 2.00, p = .058, d = .41 (mean difference: .03; upper and lower 95% confidence interval: −.055 and .001).

Although there was an increasing trend in performance with CTOA, a paired t -test between performance at zero CTOA and ~100 ms CTOA in the exogenous attention condition was only marginally significant (t(5) = 2.451; p = 0.058).

The oesophageal cancer risk among males compared with females was only marginally significant (adjusted IRR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.49; p = 0.058).

The difference between opaque and orthographic priming is only marginally significant, β = –5.6 , t = –1.9 , p = .058, probably due to the most glaring difference between the English and the Italian data – orthographic primes yield significant facilitation themselves, β = –19 , t = –5.34 , p = .0002.

PEEs from HW plots displayed a weaker effect, significant for those obtained from NT plots ( p =0.04) and only marginally significant concerning those derived from CT conditions ( p = 0.058).

100%) ( Table 1 ), but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

In the areas responsible for the word identification system (i.e., left triangular part of the IFG and left insula), only marginally significant effects were observed in the response to the types of words [left IFG: F (2,44) = 3.04, p = 0.058; left insula: F (2,44) = 3.17, p = 0.052].

daubneyi larvae was significantly associated with both variables, while the effect of the size was only marginally significant ( P = 0.058) for infection with F. hepatica .

With outliers included in the model it is only marginally significant ( p = 0.058; in all others cases * p <0.05). seq_cross and HSTC, word group based metrics, are the best performing models according to their BIC/AIC, with HSTC coming out on top.

Additionally, host/microbe-derived BAs appeared to be more abundant in SI contents, although this difference was only marginally significant (p-value = 0.058), possibly due to intra-individual variations and the relatively small sample size.

Also, in terms of work ability, older participants seem to benefit slightly more from detachment, although this interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

Note that the indirect effects were only marginally significant: β =− .07, SE = .04, p = .058, 95% CI = [− 0.144, 0.002].

Average fruit weight per plant increased by 11% from the MeSA plots, although this difference was only marginally significant ( t = 72.69 , df = 268 , p = 0.058) following Tukey HSD post-hoc tests.

Also, a unit increase in trait alexithymia increased odds of higher appropriateness rating for personal moral dilemma (see Supplementary Figure S2 ) with an odds ratio of 1.025 (95% CI [1.006, 1.048]), but there was only marginally significant association between alexithymia and ratings for impersonal moral dilemma (odds ratio = 1.0171 [0.9960, 1.0356], p = 0.058).

However, this result was only marginally significant after correcting for multiple testing (FWE p = 0.058, cluster of 45 voxels with local maxima x, y, z = −38, −48, −16).

S3, Table S8) and a positive effect of edge density, though only marginally significant, on H. scabiosae host flowering plant species richness (LM; β = 0.487, P = 0.058; Fig. 4 C, Table S8).

On the biconditional analysis, Group and Time also interacted, F (1,76) = 7.966, p = .006, η ρ 2 = .095, although this was only marginally significant when covariates were included, F (1,72) = 3.697, p = .058, η ρ 2 = .049.

Despite the previous observation of developmental recovery from hybrid dysgenesis [ 42 ], the relationship between age and the proportion of F1 atrophy is only marginally significant in our data ( F 1 , 1037 = 3.57, p = 0.058).

Similarly, a significant interaction of △HHb was also observed (F = 4.076, p = 0.016); however, only marginally significant difference of it between H 2 and PLAC groups at 100%W max ( p = 0.058) was observed and not any other significance was presented ( Table 3 ; Figure 2 ).