“only marginally significant”

100%) ( Table 1 ), but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

However, this result was only marginally significant after correcting for multiple testing (FWE p = 0.058, cluster of 45 voxels with local maxima x, y, z = −38, −48, −16).

The Sr concentration of unacidified excreta was also apparently more variable for Caspian than Rhett, but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.058; Table 2 ).

Unlike previous experiments, the main effect of prior knowledge is now only marginally significant [prior knowledge : F(1,206) = 3.633, p = 0.058, η 2 p = 0.017], and cue congruence was not significant; cue congruence: F(2,412) = 0.757, p = 0.451, η 2 p = 0.004].

4 ), the correlation was only marginally significant for BAI (p = 0.0584).

However, post hoc tests were only marginally significant for the comparison between the periods after and during the crisis ( p = .0585).

LSA and WSS were only marginally significant ( P = 0.059, P = 0.071) in multivariate analysis.

Although the figure appears to show greater slopes (faster build-up) in the switch condition than at the end of the attend condition, the Task × Time Point interaction was only marginally significant, F (1.81, 11) = 3.36, p = .059, η p 2 = .56.

Block 1 brought only marginally significant explanatory value to addictive tendencies ( F (5, 254) = 2.16, p = .059), and none of the demographic variables emerged as a significant factor in Block 1.

For example, using a simple sum score for depression, with an extreme reverse-J distribution yields an even larger and more significant estimate of interaction (0.39% variance explained; p-value = 6.8e-07) whereas using logistic regression to analyse the binary DSM IV diagnosis, predicated on an underlying normal liability, produces a smaller and only marginally significant estimate (0.06% variance explained; p-value = 0.059), although this analysis has much lower power than using a continuous variable.

If seed biomass is used in the calculation of output proportions instead of seed number, we still got similar significantly smaller output proportions, although in the case of mixture 3:1 it was only marginally significant ( P = 0.059).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a statistical significance in increase of marginal gap after firing in both Cast group ( P =.012) and SLS group ( P =.007), while only marginally significant or insignificant results were obtained for internal gap in Cast group ( P =.059) or SLS group ( P >.05), respectively ( Table 1 ).

Indeed, body-shaking events increased over time only marginally significantly in the presence of extracts from reproductives (RE: Z = 8.5, p = 0.059).

Results Using Kruskal-Wallis tests, the nurse arm improved mental health scores from baseline to week two; however this was only marginally significant (p = 0.059).

1A ); however, this difference was only marginally significant (median, 345.5 L/min; IQR = 291.8–423.2 L/min vs. median, 375.1 L/min; IQR = 319.7–485.7 L/min; P = 0.059).

They found that the peripapillary CT was slightly greater in OHT, but age-adjusted comparisons between the groups indicated that this difference was only marginally significant (p=0.059).

However this difference was only marginally significant (t-test, t = 2.1, df = 13.02, P = 0.059).

Notably, subgroup analysis of retrospective ( P = 0.021) studies revealed a significantly higher infection risk for ORIF, while the effect was only marginally significant for prospective studies ( P = 0.059).

Meanwhile, the regression coefficient for informal social support was positive but only marginally significant (β = 0.385, p = 0.059).

Phonesthemes also predicted more accurate visual word recognition, though for ELP, the empirical p -value is only marginally significant: Responses to words containing phonesthemes were more accurate in 942 cases for the ELP ( p = .059) and 985 cases for the BLP ( p = .016).

The number of hospitalizations were only marginally significant across schizophrenia caregivers and other caregivers ( P =0.059; Figure 3 ).

Whereas, relative risk reduction in the CRT-P group was only marginally significant ( P = 0.059).

We found that individuals with MDD showed reduced FA in the right UNC (WMD = −0.25, 95% CI [−0.42 to −0.09], p = 0.003; Figure 2 ); however, this effect was only marginally significant in the left UNC (WMD = −0.21, 95% CI [−0.42 to 0.01], p = 0.059; Figure 2 ).

However, a similar difference between the fast stress and slow stress condition ( M = 72.30, SD = 9.68) was only marginally significant, t (7) = 2.25, p = .059.

In the fully adjusted model, the RR was further reduced and was only marginally significant (RR: 1.20, p = .059).