“only marginally significant”

Our regression analysis indeed shows that, for either definition, the CRT score is a significant (or marginally significant) predictor of all the categories (Probit regressions with robust standard errors; see panel ( a ) in electronic supplementary material, tables S1–S4) and the interaction between country and CRT is only marginally significant for the choice-based egalitarian variable ( p = 0.06; all the remaining p 's > 0.15; see panel ( a ) in electronic supplementary material, tables S5–S8).

The meta‐analysis showed that implant sites augmented with XCM had more favorable changes in color when compared to implant sites augmented with FGG, but the difference was only marginally significant (MD −1.19; 95% CI −2.40 to 0.03; p = 0.06; Figure 4f ).

77.7%, p = 0.02), whereas perceived severity was only marginally significant (91.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.06).

However, the interaction between instruction and stimulation was only marginally significant, F (1,19) = 3.99, p = .06, MSE = 1.24, η p 2 = .17.

Consistent with Hypothesis 3 (age-related reduction in adaptive sampling), the effect was only marginally significant in older adults, F (1, 39) = 3.63, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.09.

Consistent with the hypotheses, in the final model (Step 4), greater infertility stigma for both men and women was associated with higher search for meaning (men β = 0.26; women β = 0.20), however the association for men was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

In 1997, a second official study reported a 50% increased leukemia risk for this target group, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.060).

A post-hoc correlation of the difference in dyad scores with variant as a collapsed binary variable (non-fluent PPA vs other PPA) revealed a moderate but only marginally significant relationship (Rho = −.452, P = .06).

Although E/E′ tended to increase with increasing WC, this relationship was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Interestingly, after adjustment for HIV− and CVD‐related risk factors, the prevalence ratios of coronary artery stenosis above 50% associated with each SD increase in values of IL‐6, hs‐CRP, and D‐dimer in our study were comparable to the hazard ratios reported in the SMART trial, 56 although the association of hs‐CRP with coronary artery stenosis was only marginally significant ( P =0.06) and the relationship of D‐dimer with coronary artery stenosis was not statistically significant.

However, in the second model, which excluded antenatal levels of blood manganese but included levels of cord blood manganese during birth, the coefficient was of similar magnitude but was only marginally significant for both cognitive (B = -2.20, p = 0.06) and language skills (B = -2.17, p = 0.08). 3.2.2 Non-significant findings The three studies that did not find a significant association between antenatal depression and cognitive outcomes received good [ 53 ] and fair [ 48 , 54 ] quality ratings.

F0start and AMrate tended to decrease from negative to positive valence, but these effects were only marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.06).

While the difference between these two enrichments is only marginally significant (one-tailed Z -score P < 0.06), H3K27ac marks alone capture more variants than H3K27ac overlapping DHS variants (7.7% vs. 5.8%) but explains a smaller heritability fraction (44.3% vs. 48.8%) ( Fig. 6 C; Supplemental Fig.

Noteworthily, a negative association (although only marginally significant, p = 0.06) was identified between upstream wetlands and geometric mean concentrations of E. coli for all sampling events.

The two are related, as has often been reported, but in this sample, the correlation was only marginally significant ( τ = −0.171 p = 0.06, LBF = −0.03 CI (−0.35, 0.01)).

Moreover, new foliage produced in 2013 following feeding by progrediens on young (2012) and mature (2011) tissues was found to be 11% higher in N concentration than foliage produced by controls, although this effect was only marginally significant ( F 1,28 = 3.80, P = 0.06).

Among the females, the risk of occupational injury was tended to increase with job tenure (i.e., 2.5% in those with job tenure of less than a year; 2.4% in those with 1–4 years; 3.5% in those with 5–9 years; and 5.4% in those with 10 years or more), although the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.060).

The 20:5ω3 followed a similar trend, but differences were only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The only marginally significant result (p = 0.06) suggests a difference in speciation rate between tropically and subtropically distributed lineages, with higher rates in the tropics.

Fungicide treatment reduced plant Hill-Shannon diversity ( F 3,60 = 5.42, p = 0.002, η 2 partial = 0.12) and Hill-Simpson diversity, although this latter main effect was only marginally significant ( F 3,60 = 2.68, p = 0.06, η 2 partial = 0.07).

The same analyses were performed as for the OLP for these four parameters and showed only marginally significant effect of pre-post for VSA1m ( F (1,5) = 7.76; p = 0.06) and marginally significant effect of the session ∗ pre-post interaction ( F (7,42) = 2.2; p = 0.053).

However, this interpretation needs to be considered with caution, first because the Group by Session by Deviance size by Laterality interaction was only marginally significant ( p < 0.06) and, second, because we found an increase in N250 amplitude that was as large for large than for small duration deviant stimuli.

Children born sixth or later have 46% higher odds (OR = 1.46), although this result is only marginally significant (p=0.06).

Anxiety rose between the initial and final measurement, although this effect was only marginally significant, F (1,94) = 3.57, P = .06, and partial η 2 = .04.

At the same time, performance in the Go/No-go was predicted by IC at 2 years of age, although the estimate for this prediction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).