“only marginally significant”

In fact the corresponding effect in Japan was only marginally significant, β = −0.09, t (455) = 1.83, p < 0.07.

Elecsys t-tau and p-tau181 levels, as well as their ratios with Aβ 1-42 , were also markedly higher in pathology-confirmed AD compared to non-AD dementia (n = 8; all p < 0.001; Figure 1 ) and separated these groups with very high accuracy (AUC 0.94–0.97); differences in Aβ 1-42 levels, however, were only marginally significant ( p = 0.07, AUC [95% confidence interval] 0.71 [0.47–0.96]) ( Figure 2 ).

Post-hoc analyses showed that Japanese books had significantly more challenge events than Indonesian books ( M Japanese = 4.75, SD = 2.49; M Indonesian = 2.6, SD = 1.76, p = 0.035) and that American books had a greater number of challenge events than Indonesian books, although the difference was only marginally significant ( M American = 4.5, SD = 3.46, p = 0.07).

No significant correlations ( p s > 0.1) were found between the ELS subcales and lifetime ayahuasca intake (ELS-v: ρ = 0.08, n.s.; ELS-f: ρ = 0.01, n.s.), and only marginally significant correlations emerged between the ELS subscales and the age of initial ayahuasca intake (ELS-v: r = 0.10, p = 0.07; ELS-f: r = 0.13, p = 0.05).

While fewer negative behaviors were observed in the treatment group, the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

However, if we relied on a Poisson regression model the results were substantially lower and were only marginally significant for robberies (b=−0.02; p=0.07) and total violence (b=−0.01; p=0.09), reducing the respective incidence by 3% and 2%.

First, we measured carotenoids and chlorophyll in roots of 50 μM ABA-treated plants, and although only marginally significant ( P = 0.07), a trend toward increased chlorophyll a and carotenoid levels was observable ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).

CAD index itself was only marginally significant as a predictor of survival in this model ( p = 0.07 for rs1462845 and rs1915585 and p = 0.04 for rs6788787).

Pigeons from the individual and cultural learning treatments had lower efficiency than that observed in the last flight in 2016 (2016 versus indiv.: z = −3.862, p = 0.001; versus cult.: z = −6.774, p < 0.001); the difference was only marginally significant for the collective learning treatment (2016 versus coll.: z = −2.626, p = 0.07).

Regarding the LAD exposure, only the near maximum dose was significantly associated with increased CAC in LAD (OR = 1.04, p = 0.02), but this association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) in multivariate analysis. 4.

For the duration of CE and the self/environment dimension, the effect of stage was only marginally significant ([ F (3) = 2.8, p = 0.07] and [ F (3) = 2.7, p = 0.08] respectively).

However, the higher relative abundance of Prevotella bivia in women with SPE was only marginally significant after adjustment for BMI ( P = 0.07) in the confirmation cohort, suggesting that the role of Prevotella bivia in SPE may be modified by BMI.

However, the difference in the lengths of their current romantic relationships was only marginally significant, t (1020) = −1.83, p = .07.

In this model, all other relations between maternal/pregnancy characteristics and sUA levels remained similar to those reported in Table 2 , except the interaction between Fetal Sex and the Morning Slope of sUA was not statistically significant nor trending and the interaction between Maternal Age and Pregnancy Stage was only marginally significant ( b =-0.05, SE=0.03, p =0.07, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.004]).

The difference in dynamic viscosity was only marginally significant in one study (P = 0.07), but it was insignificant in the other study (P = 0.2).

A similar pattern was observed in monoculture plates, however this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07, Figure 5A ).

A genotype × system interaction accounted for 11.4% of the total variation in exudation, though it was only marginally significant (p = 0.07; Fig. 2 c).

It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).

The effect of altitude on replacement was only marginally significant at the national level (G = 8.53; P = 0.07) because patterns differed across regions (data not shown).

Post-error accuracy was also higher at Time 2 (0.96±0.01) than Time 1 (0.92±0.02), although this effect was only marginally significant ( t (31)=1.88, P =0.07).

The only marginally significant relation found was between multilingualism as a continuous score and RT specifically in incongruent trials [ t (154) = 1.82, p = 0.070].

Due to cortisol’s known circadian rhythm, the cortisol levels at T 1 were estimated to be lower for the Stress-post-Craving HC ( b = −21.77, t (73) = −2.66, p < 0.01) and CU (only marginally significant: b = −14.39, t (73) = −1.84, p = 0.070).

The differences in students spacing patterns over the quarter differed by section for Year 1 [ X 2 (6, N = 544) = 19.51, p < .001], although this effect was only marginally significant for Year 2 [ X 2 (6, N = 782) = 11.31, p = .07] ( Fig 2B ).

This main effect was due to that confidence rating was higher when participants responded perceiving a fearful than angry or happy face, although the differences were only marginally significant ( P = 0.07, P = 0.08, respectively) ( Figure 5 A, left).

A statistically significant difference was also detected in the fine mapped 24.7-Mb region of the chromosome in males ( p = 0.001), but the difference was only marginally significant in females ( p = 0.07).