“only marginally significant”

In Gacyacyari (local variety), only marginally significant (p< 0.1) increases of δ 13 C were found for soluble sugar in the YFEL and cellulose in lower leaf for plants under water deficit.

Elevation interacted significantly with living status for beech only, and almost doubled the difference between living and dead trees, whereas for pine, the effects were only marginally significant (p<0.1), though high in magnitude.

Concentrations of C and N in soil and microbial biomass In the mixed heath soil, the concentrations of NH + 4 , NO − 3 , DOC, and DON in the soil mesocosms were 43–67% lower than the concentrations in the control mesocosms, although the difference for NH + 4 was only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Tukey's HSD; Table 3 ).

There was also a large but only marginally significant ( F test, .05 < p < .10) increase in ScASN1 gene expression in response to sulphur deficiency (Figure 14 b). 9 PROSPECTS FOR REDUCING ACRYLAMIDE‐FORMING POTENTIAL BY PLANT BREEDING An important question for breeders is how much could breeding reduce the acrylamide‐forming potential of crops.

For low RetirPlan, an unexpected increase in RetirIntent was also observed, although it was only marginally significant [ F (1,203) = 2.72, p = 0.10].

β-caryophyllene showed a similar decrease (36.4%), although the decrease was only marginally significant ( F 1,7 = 3.56, P = 0.10).

aBMD in the lumbar spine and trabecular vBMD in the L 3 vertebra was lower in the “high HOMA-IR” group, but the differences were only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

However, women who retired for voluntary reasons were more likely to report depression in the follow-up, although this effect was only marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.1).

Male gender, higher age and neurosis now became significant predictors of drug related death, while psychosis was only marginally significant (p = .10).

With respect to HHb levels, this mediation proved to be only marginally significant in the left DLPFC (a: B = −0.24 (0.121), p < .1, R 2 = 0.08; b: B = 1.01 (0.348), p < .01, R 2 = 0.16; Z = 1.63, p < .1).

Attentional drifting showed only marginally significant differences for the experimental condition (F (3,135) = 2.403, p < .1, η 2 = 0.05) with a trend toward highest attentional drifts during the selective attention condition.

However, most of this gap existed already before the closures, so that the difference in the increase in these conducive activities is only marginally significant (+0.2 versus +0.4 h for low- and high-achievers, respectively, p <0.1).

These results are, however, only marginally significant at p -value < 10%.

All the autoregressive paths were significant, except for the autoregressive stability path for sleep from T1 to T2 that was only marginally significant (Beta = 0.12, SE = 0.07, p < 0.10) (see Table 2 and Fig. 2 ), indicating that deviations from the individual average score in a factor were always related to an unexpected change in the same factor at the following timepoint.

However, a reverse pattern of association, though only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), was found in the older adults group, with a significant DASH by age group interaction ( p < 0.05) in the three models. 4.

Lastly, the propensity to switch to an alternative mapping following negative feedback was higher under reliability (20%, SEM =2%) than unreliability conditions (14%, SEM =3%), although the difference was only marginally significant ( t (14)=2, p <0.1). 3.2.1.2 Experiment 2 – effect of reliability instructions on initial acquisition Comparing performance in blocks with objectively identical feedback reliability but differing instructions, we found no reliable difference in accuracy between reliability-instruction blocks (86%, SEM =1%) than unreliability-instructed blocks (80%, SEM =4%; t (14)=1.28, p =0.22).

Fourth, some effects were only marginally significant based on a p value of <.10.

The results revealed that the odds of a 9 and 10 were 1.2 times more likely if a patient transferred once but only marginally significant ( P < .10).

In contrast, more boys than girls screened positive for SOR at age seven years although the difference was only marginally significant (60 girls, and 82 boys; OR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.0–1.6, p = .10).

Follow up tests within the Commander mission showed that the difference between Military and Firefighter groups was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), but that both Military and Firefighter groups differed significantly from the Surveillance group, t (114) = 6.07, p < 0.01, and t (114) = 8.37, p < 0.01, respectively.

Again, this effect did not extend to the performance dimensions (i.e., the moderated mediation effects predicted in hypothesis 5b were only marginally significant [ p < .10]).

Alcohol consumption patterns also showed some influence, with frequent drinkers expressing 21% higher WTP than non-drinkers in the past 12 months (120 429 vs 99 210 BTN), although this difference was only marginally significant (p<0.1).

Participants in control clusters reported slightly greater neighborhood disorder than participants in treatment clusters at baseline, although the trend was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

For the Pyrenees area, the trend showed an increase in urban and forest and a decrease in open and crops, but crops were the only marginally significant change ( p < 0.1).

However, these intra-annual differences were only marginally significant (P<0.1).