“only marginally significant”

Groups with DM tended to have a longer latency, smaller amplitude, and a lower CV compared to groups without DM, but these differences were only marginally significant ( p <0.1).

Yet the effect for ghost authors is not significant at the conventional p < 0.05 level but only marginally significant at p < 0.1.

Greenfinches ( Carduelis chloris ) and tree sparrows also showed higher population densities in 2010 but differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10; Fig. 4 ).

Women age 35 and above had twice the odds of inconsistently reporting that they experienced a post-partum complication relative to women age 15–24, although the value is only marginally significant (OR: 2.03, p < .10).

However, this effect is only marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

While drinking activity was significantly reduced for all animals together, the 46% drop (i.e., a two-fold reduction) in total activity at experimental pans was only marginally significant ( t = −1.62, p = 0.1 for the drained × during interaction, Supplementary Appendix Tables S7 , S8 , Fig.

However, the difference was only marginally significant ( P < 0.1).

The mean SAR value was 7.4 in the surrounding matrix soils and 1.7 in the middens, but this difference was only marginally significant ( p = .1), because of relatively high standard errors.

Figure 1 D shows a negative influence of one trial back, only marginally significant after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.1, logBF = 0.49).

Although it was only marginally significant in statistical analysis, the rest populations also showed signs of recent bottlenecks (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 0.05 < P < 0.1).

Mean weekly temperature was positively correlated with transmission, but the association was considerably weaker than that observed for precipitation and only marginally significant (*p<0.1; figure 4B,C ; online supplemental table S4 ).

Additional analysis switching the reference group for race ( Supplementary Table S3 ) suggested that this effect of proportion kin tended to be positive but only marginally significant for non-White adults ( p < .10).

In case of the 10 Hz stimulus XCOH, the attention effect was only marginally significant ( P< .1).

The possible explanation for why the difference in the improvement of moral imagination between paper-based and AR-based simulations is only marginally significant, or at a level of p < 10%, is because this study does not distinguish between the learning styles of the participants.

Likewise, among women in the highest parity group, injunctive norms were significantly associated with contraceptive use; this relationship was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) among women with single parity, and it was not significant among women without children.

This benefit persisted at 3-months post intervention but was only marginally significant [ F (1, 85) = 2.77, p = 0.10].

Biomass allocation to the leader shoot (developed during the year of the experiment) was higher in the straight-type plants compared with the crooked-type ones in both treatments, although differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10) ( Fig. 4B ).

Results Statistical Testing The linear age trend was only marginally significant (Δχ 2 = 2.68, Δ df = 1; p = .10).

Similarly, current integrals were smaller in nisoldipine; however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.1) in the case of TTX ( Figure 2 D).

Concentrations of C and N in soil and microbial biomass In the mixed heath soil, the concentrations of NH + 4 , NO − 3 , DOC, and DON in the soil mesocosms were 43–67% lower than the concentrations in the control mesocosms, although the difference for NH + 4 was only marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, Tukey's HSD; Table 3 ).

Only respondents who stopped working between waves but who had previously worked beyond SPA voluntarily reported improvements in CASP-19 scores ( β = 0.97), although once changes in health were accounted for this was only marginally significant ( P < 0.10).

There were no interactions of temperature and nutrient level except chl a -W and flux of NO 3 − -N, but the latter was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Elevation interacted significantly with living status for beech only, and almost doubled the difference between living and dead trees, whereas for pine, the effects were only marginally significant (p<0.1), though high in magnitude.

Every one unit increase in stress was associated with 33% higher odds of day drinking since the start of COVID‐19, but the effect was only marginally significant at p < 0.10.

β-caryophyllene showed a similar decrease (36.4%), although the decrease was only marginally significant ( F 1,7 = 3.56, P = 0.10).