“quite significant”

The increase in the image intensity of globus pallidus was quite significant between healthy controls and HE patients ( p < 0.0001 ) .

Since Mdm2 heterozygosity greatly delays tumor development in Arf -null mice that have both alleles of p53 , the difference in mean survival between p53+/+ and the p53+/− Arf -null Mdm2+/− mice was much larger than their Mdm2 wild-type counterparts and quite significant (p<0.0001, log-rank test; Fig. 2B , Table 1 ).

There were quite significant differences in EEG–EMG coherence between patients with RDI >15/h and patients with RDI <15/h (area under the curve = 0.843, P < 0.0001 for the first night of sleep study and area under the curve = 0.892, P < 0.0001 for the second night of sleep study).

4 b1 , p = .14) and was quite significant for i.v . delivery (Fig. 4 b2 , p = 1.07 × 10 −4 ).

Similar to mid-term mortality, subgroup analysis showed that LVEF improvement was quite significant in levosimendan vs. placebo subgroups (mean difference: 5.65%, 95%CI: 2.72–8.57%, P=0.0002, I 2 =33%) ( Figure 4 ).

On the other hand, the WSS change on the superior side between the control and LAL embryos is determined as quite significant ( p = 0.00022).

In Table 1 , the crude ratio of acute pancreatitis between the 2 groups were compared using Chi-squared tests, which is quite significant ( P = 0.0003).

In the chronic phase, VA differences became quite significant ( p < 0.001) with an average VA of 0.75 Snellen in Group 2.

When bed rails were used during the night, they had a protective effect, which is quite significant, as 37 of the 123 falls occurred during the night (P<0.001).

Greater suppression of spontaneous motor activity in ME‐400 mg/kg‐treated groups was observed at all time intervals as compared to the ME‐200 mg/kg treated group, and was quite significant (*** p < 0.001) with respect to the negative control group.

A quite significant correlation between the magnitude of ADRB index and IgG responses to PfMSP1p19 was found (Rho = 0.71 and 0.68, P < 10 −3 for Dielmo and Ndiop, respectively).

In the Balance task, the effect of identicalness was quite significant, with identical-rectangles stimuli being rated higher than dissimilar-rectangles stimuli (70.0 vs. 45.0), F (1, 23) = 21.75, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.49.

In fact, women found the app easier to use ( M = 3.98 vs 3.45), and this difference was quite significant ( P < .001).

TDEE at aerosolic dose of 6% (w/v) exhibited decreased average cough frequency (4.83 ± 0.30) which is quite significant ( P < 0.001) and effective as compared to standard drug codeine.

There are two important differences between the two groups regarding the prediction model of ED: the model explains the higher ED variance in psoriasis patients (35%) when compared to healthy persons (19%), and the contribution of expressive suppression is moderately significant in healthy persons ( p < 0.05), and quite significant in psoriasis patients ( p < 0.001) ( Table 7 ).

A complete response was found to be statistically quite significant in patients with the positive autologous serum test( p = 0.001).

The meta-analysis's findings demonstrated that PRP may considerably reduce DFU healing times when compared to traditional therapy, and the difference was quite significant ( p < 0.001). 10 In a randomized, double-blind study, Driver et al. 21 investigated the effectiveness of PRP treatment for DFU.

Of SNPs having p < 0.04, about 65 per cent came from the 'haplotype conforming' category, and this excess was quite significant ( p ≈ 0.001).

Confirming that absenteeism trends change over time, especially during and following the COVID-19 epidemic, the year variable is also quite significant (F = 15.796, p < 0.001); partial η 2 = 0.028.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin was 0.92, and the Bartlett test results were quite significant (χ 2 = 4337.71, df = 78, p < 0.001).

The relationship between knowledge and practices was quite significant ( p < 0.001).

The reduction was observed in Group B which is quite significant (p value < 0.001) from that of Group A and Group E, while it was significant at p value < 0.01 from Group C and D.

However, the effect of caring behavior on turnover intention is also negative and quite significant (B = -0.2214, SE = 0.0416, t = -5.32, p < .001).

Although the n number included in the training set (n = 44) and test set (n = 11) was limited, it was quite significant with AUC = 0.800 (95% CI 0.40–1.00, p < 0.001), sensitivity 1.00, and specificity 0.80 (Fig. 5 ).

According to study results, the mean angle of kyphosis in these patients at the presentation was 63.24 ± 9.96 and at the end of the study was 36.5 ± 13.4°, which the difference was quite significant both before and after treatment ( P < 0.001).