Barely Significant
← all phrases

“significantly not different”

92 sentences · 92 papers · 21,921 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.05

Listed by Hankins, posted since

In the literature

Considering Table 2 , RWC percentage was significantly higher in green Salanova at the beginning of the growing period, while at 13 DAT there was no significant difference between the two cultivars, then at 16 DAT RWC was 12.5% higher in red Salanova which is in correspondence with daily water uptake that was 19.2% higher in red Salanova and significantly not different at DAT 13 ( Table 1 ).
Cell viability of SH-SY5Y WT and SH-SY5Y G93A cells in presence of Na-azide for 3 and 30 min leads to a decrease in cell survival (75.0 ± 3.4 and 61.2 ± 6.1% for 3 and 30 min incubation, respectively, for WT; Figure 2B ) and were significantly not different with SOD1 G93A cells (73.5 ± 6.2 and 54.0 ± 8.4% for 3 and 30 min incubation, respectively; Figure 2B ; Table 2 ).
Similar results were observed by Jehan M et al 5 but they found that though loss of eyelash reflex was significantly rapid with sevoflurane, the difference in total induction time i.e.till tracheal intubation was significantly not different in both the groups.
Sensitivity of pretreatment SCC-Ag was significantly not different according to prognostic factors such as menopausal status, tumor size, and lymph node involvement, but was higher in the patients with higher stage, squamous cell carcinoma, high pretreatment SCC-Ag level, positive biochemical response, and concurrent LRR and DM than in the other patient groups.
Because the inferential value of a failure to reject the null hypothesis in frequentist statistical approaches is limited, for all RNA-seq expression datasets, we coupled our standard differential expression with a test for whether each gene could be flagged as “significantly not different.” Defining a region of practical equivalence as a change of no more than 1.5-fold in either direction, we tested the null hypothesis of at least a 1.5-fold change for each gene, using the gene-wise estimates of the SE in log 2 fold change (reported by Deseq2) and the assumption that the actual l 2 fcs are normally distributed.