“slightly significant”

The dose factor was slightly significant ( p = 0.04) in relation with survival time compared to haplogroup membership factor ( p <0,001) ( Table 3 ).

Only in the group of AIPC with intrapancreatic involvement there was a slightly significant increase in the IgG4-CD138 ratio in comparison with non-autoimmune CP (p = 0.04).

The findings of the study further showed that there was a slightly significant correlation between “EL” and “OCB” ( P = 0.04, r = 0.09).

A decrease in distal zone length was also slightly significant between the two years, but only when all genotypes were considered together (p value = 0.04).

The PFS and OS univariate models (estimated from 1000-boot-strapped replications of the data) showed a strong significant association with the expression of TGF-β ( p = 0.003 and p = 0.002) and a slightly significant association with LDH and NLR values ( p = 0.04) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

A comparison of the radial positioning of two chromosomal subregions between human ES and lymphoblastoid cells revealed a slightly significant difference (p < 0.04) for the p-arm of HSA12 but not the p-arm of HSA6 [ 44 ].

Additionally, the difference between the study design groups was slightly significant (Cochran’s Q = 6.38, P = 0.04, Fig. 3 -D).

According to such analysis, BAG1 expression shows a slightly significant prognostic value, i.e., higher survival in low-expressing patients ( p = 0.04).

In addition, Cole and Kazarian [ 9 ] also reported that the relationship between the LEE and CFI was satisfactory in total score; however, the correlations between the four subscales (intrusiveness, illness attitude, expectancy/tolerance, and emotional responses) were slightly significant ( P = 0.04-0.05).

97.8% uncuffed group) with a slightly significant difference in the insertion depth (11.0 cm in the cuffed group vs. 10.5 cm in the uncuffed group; p = 0.04).

The CE-radscore (Equation 4, Appendix S5 ) was significantly higher in nonresponders than in responders in the training set ( P <0.001), and the difference was slightly significant in the testing set ( P =0.04) ( Figure S1Bb ).

However, only a slightly significant difference in coding DNM burden was observed when comparing male probands with ASD and male controls (RR = 1·34, p = 0·04; RR test, Figure 1 b).

The association between sex and seropositivity was slightly significant ( Χ 2 = 4.32, P = 0.04), with higher seroprevalence in females.

However, there was a slightly significant fit for T3 to a 12-h cycle ( P = 0.04).

Global metabolite profile was not significantly altered after short-term treatment compared to the control ( p = 0.71), though after long-term treatment, there was a slightly significant difference observed ( p = 0.04) ( Figure 5 a).

BMI ranged from 26 ± 3.1 kg/m 2 in group A to 25 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 in group C, with a slightly significant difference between these two groups ( p = 0.040), while other comparisons returned comparable values (all p ≥ 302).

Furthermore, there was a slightly significant difference ( p = .04) for the origin and year of publication.

A slightly significant reduction in Gardnerella Vaginalis ( p = 0.040) and Candida Albicans ( p = 0.049) was found after treatment.

However, using a phylogenetic regression, a slightly significant ( P = 0.04) embryo growth was detected.

Postoperative Mortality The 16 studies 3 evaluating postoperative mortality showed a slightly significant difference in rate of mortality between BAV and TAV patients (16.2% vs 18.8%; OR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.97; P =0.04; I 2 =65%; P <0.001; Figure 4 ).

There was a slightly significant ( p = 0.04) reduction of the BMI in the post-op period (from 29.06 ± 4.53 to 27.65 ± 3.45).

We found that the enrichment of URUAY motif in the transcript regions was slightly significant in the 53 genes (79.2% versus 69.7% in background, P = 0.04) compared with that of RRACH motif (98.1% versus 99.2% in background, P = 0.29), although both motifs were found in high frequency of presence.

Seven of the 11 reports did not produce statistically significant results, and their pooled RR was slightly significant (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.98, P = 0.04) [ Figure 1 ].

Of these 164 high-ability students, 95 (57.9%) were male and 69 (42.1%) female, which was a slightly significant difference in percentage (χ2 = 4.12, p = 0.04).

There was a slightly significant difference in walking speed among Groups (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 75) = 2.87, p = 0.04), while no differences were observed in cadence (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 76) = 0.94, p = 0.42).