“slightly significant”

There was a slightly significant difference in walking speed among Groups (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 75) = 2.87, p = 0.04), while no differences were observed in cadence (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 76) = 0.94, p = 0.42).

Door-to-image times were longer in the non-working-hour group, with a slightly significant difference (12 min vs . 13 min; p =0.04).

There was a slightly significant ( p = 0.04) reduction of the BMI in the post-op period (from 29.06 ± 4.53 to 27.65 ± 3.45).

A decrease in distal zone length was also slightly significant between the two years, but only when all genotypes were considered together (p value = 0.04).

These 16 responders showed a significant increase of ADCmin and ADCmean ( p = 0.02) and a slightly significant decrease of SUVmax and SUVmean ( p < 0.04), while there were no significant changes in non-responders.

Seven of the 11 reports did not produce statistically significant results, and their pooled RR was slightly significant (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.98, P = 0.04) [ Figure 1 ].

However, using a phylogenetic regression, a slightly significant ( P = 0.04) embryo growth was detected.

Furthermore, there was a slightly significant difference ( p = .04) for the origin and year of publication.

leaf shoot there was a slightly significant difference ( p = 0.04) towards one of the sides ( Figure S2 ).

Regarding these anthropometric variables, we also compared the results obtained at T2 and T3, observing a further significant reduction of body weight and BMI ( p = 0.007), but not of WC in the KETO group, and a slightly significant reduction of BMI ( p = 0.04) in the MEDI group.

In the results, a slightly significant difference was found in the recessive model (GG vs GA + AA) under a fixed-effects model (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01–1.58, p = 0.0405) with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.55) ( Figure 3 ).

Models trained for the cross-tissue analysis instead had a less evident improvement with the lists filter: only the List unsupervised returned a slightly significant improvement ( p -value = 0.04084).

The positivity for maspin showed a slightly significant correlation with the basal-like subtype ( P = 0.041) (Table 4 ).

However, 3 h and 6 h after TACE, CYFRA 21-1 values showed slightly significant differences (p = 0.041).

We found slightly significant publication bias in 34 studies ( P = .041).

The baked clay and the painted cement surfaces did provide slightly significant differences in mortality ( p = 0.041).

Guarana in Combination with Glucose and Caffeine Provides a Short-Term Stimulus at Low Concentrations Upon an assessment of locomotor velocity using guarana seed extract together with caffeine and glucose ( Fig 7 ) we observed a slightly significant increase using low concentrations (0.001 mM for each guarana and caffeine, with 0.561 mM glucose) after only two minutes of habituation (p = 0.041).

6,809 versus 3,737 for patients who underwent axi-cel with a slightly significant correlation with cytopenia ( p = 0.041).

There was a poor but slightly significant correlation between IAP and AP (Fig. 1 ): AP = 1.0357 × IAP + 94.107 ( R 2 = 0.12, P = 0.042), but the bias was considerable.

Potential plastic cover in the catchment showed to be a slightly significant explanatory variable ( p = 0.042) (see Supplementary Material Figure SI9 , Table SI4 , and Table SI5 ); however, the polymer types detected in the sediment do not match the common polymer (PE) used in agricultural production in Europe.

At T0, a slightly significant correlation of FF with HFMSE (p = 0.042) and disease duration (p = 0.042) at thigh level and only with HFMSE (p = 0.042) at leg level was found.

The mean age at enrolment was 65.5 ± 46.3 days, with a slightly significant difference among groups (F = 3.327; p = 0.042).

Both parents current tobacco-smoke exposure and number of cigarettes/day (data not shown) were not related to asthma, whereas maternal history of smoking was slightly significant (p = 0.042).

The distribution of this variable was not normal, and the differences between the medians were slightly significant using a Mann–Whitney U-test, non-parametric test (p=0.042).

Proportions of preterm live births did not change during lockdown when different gestational age categories were analyzed, except for a slightly significant increase among the extremely premature births (23 + 0–27 + 6 weeks): OR 2.09 (95% CI 1.02–4.28; p = 0.042).