“slightly significant”

Both parents current tobacco-smoke exposure and number of cigarettes/day (data not shown) were not related to asthma, whereas maternal history of smoking was slightly significant (p = 0.042).

With regard to the CD8 + T cell count, we were able to detect a slightly significant negative correlation solely between the MRD (w96-BL)/BL and BL CD4 + T cell count ( p = 0.042), but other time-point comparisons did not show any significant association, thus it could be due to chance.

At T0, a slightly significant correlation of FF with HFMSE (p = 0.042) and disease duration (p = 0.042) at thigh level and only with HFMSE (p = 0.042) at leg level was found.

A slightly significant difference ( p = 0.0425) was observed between T6w/FU and T24w/FU. 3.2.5.

Furthermore, the results of statistical analyses were not so diverse between volumes <9 cm 3 (p = 0.3267, insignificant) and ≥9 cm 3 (p = 0.0429, slightly significant).

There was a slightly significant negative correlation between PRL and monoPRL % (p = 0.043 and r = −0.181).

In addition, there were no differences reported between non-synergistic and synergistic metabolic scores in PI3Ki–TAKi (Mann–Whitney test p -value = 0.363), but some slightly significant differences were reported between scores in PI3Ki–MEKi ( p -value = 0.043) (see Fig. 4 B).

AUDIT global scores showed a slightly significant relationship with the results in ASA’s Ability component (rho = 0.083, p = 0.043; Spearman test) and with age (rho = −0.082, p = 0.045; Spearman test) ( Figure 1 B).

A post-hoc ANOVA revealed that feeding treatment significantly impacted δ 15 N ( P < 0.001), whereas an interaction between time and treatment was slightly significant ( P = 0.043).

On the other hand, we found a slightly significant influence of sex on Vitamin D status ( p = 0.043).

Comparison of Growth Trajectory and AH Between rhGH-Treated and Untreated NS Subjects The comparison of H measurements between the rhGH treated and untreated NS subjects showed a significant difference between the 2-year-olds groups ( p=0.024 ), the 5-year-olds groups ( p<0.001 ), the pubertal onset groups ( p <0.001 ), and a slightly significant difference between the 10-year-olds groups ( p=0.043 ).

Mean shell width is nevertheless slightly larger in males, which is why the differences in the ratio became slightly significant (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.044).

MDA showed a slightly significant difference between groups after the study ( p = .044), also, the changes for MDA were not statistically different between groups ( p = .062). 4.

The results showed that, in unstimulated cells, there was a slightly significant downregulation of the mRNA level of SLC9A4 in rs12987977/GG carriers compared with TT carriers ( P = 0.044; Figure 3A ).

The COVID-19 period was slightly significant in the descriptive statistics stratified for GOS (Table 2 , p = 0.044); this small difference was, however, no longer evident after excluding the 4 patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 ( p = 0.072) and it was not significant in the multivariate logistic model (Table 3 , p = 0.052).

The maintenance condition factor exerted a slightly significant effect (p = 0.044) only on the VO 2R of mussels fed the L L diet.

Moreover, when introducing the second block, hedonic balance related to students showed a slightly significant effect ( p = 0.044) on job satisfaction. 3.

Meta-analysis showed that the difference in the values of RR was slightly significant in the disease control rate (RR =1.09, 95% CI: 1.00–1.19, P =0.044) ( Figure 4 ).

The mean UtAPI MoM values at T1 and T2 were slightly significantly higher in the RG compared to the CG (p = 0.044).

The statistical data obtained from ANOVA indicated that TPGS exhibited an agonistic significant effect on the nanoparticle entrapment efficiency ( p = 0.0079), whereas PCL exhibited a slightly significant antagonistic effect ( p = 0.0440).

Analysis of the history of bleeding disease showed that there was no difference in the history of digestive tract ulcers among the treatment groups but that there was a slightly significant difference in the history of cerebral hemorrhage ( p = 0.044), which may be related to the number of samples.

This robust analysis showed a slightly significant interaction between question type and age group ( F 1,44 = 4.2743, p = 0.0446); however, robust post hoc tests on the difference scores (ToM–factual reasoning) did not reveal a significant difference in RT as a function of age group (estimate = 0.2952, p = 0.208). 3.3 .

Importantly, we found a slightly significant three-way interaction involving Outcome, Time and stimulation type [ F (2,105) = 3.185, P = 0.045].

The first model was slightly significant and showed an explained variance of about 1% [ R 2 = 0.01, F (2, 343) = 3.13, p = 0.045].

Since no controls were found to carry this variant, the difference between cases and controls was slightly significant ( P = 0.0450).