“slightly significant”

It was also possible to assess a slightly significant worsening of SRT in the SbNw configuration with the BAHD (−5.1 dB HL [−8.4÷ 2.4]) compared to when unaided (−6.6 dB HL [−9.4 ÷ −2.9]) ( p = 0.047), but there was a significant improvement in SRT in the SwNb configuration (−3.7 dB HL [−7 ÷ 0.1]) in comparison to when unaided (−0.9 dB HL [−3.7 ÷ 2.7]) ( p = 0.009).

The sensitivity analysis showed a slightly significant result in the pleiotropy test (MR-Egger intercept test, P = 0.047); however, the results of the heterogeneity test (Cochran’s Q, P = 0.604) and MR PRESSO Global test for horizontal pleiotropy ( P = 0.615) were not statistically significant (Table 3 ).

Blood pressure classes and hypertension Taken as a whole, the differences in the distribution of the four diagnostic classes in the two groups were slightly significant ( p = 0.047), with a lower prevalence of normal BP (58.0% vs. 82.2%) and a higher prevalence of the other three classes in Group A; in particular, masked hypertension was much higher in Group A (25.9% vs. 8.9%) (Table 4 ).

For this SNP, the best model selected by WLD included an interaction between PHYC and the environment, and this interaction effect was slightly significant (P = 0.0472).

Comparison between RNA2(+) and RNA2(−) curves revealed that in most cases no correlation could be determined ( P >0.05); only in the case of wt160 were differences between both slightly significant ( P =0.0475) (Table S2).

Mantel tests comparing the pairwise F ST to the Euclidian geographic distance between populations within the Belizean and Floridian island‐groups revealed that there was only a slightly significant correlation within the Belizean island‐group ( p = .0475). 4 DISCUSSION Haplotypes of nd2 from A. stipes were highly divergent ( ca . 4.5%) between the Belize Cays and Florida Keys island‐groups.

In the horizontal plan (mesio-distal), the mean error was 0.87 ± 0.62 mm (range 0.2–2.53 mm; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.05 mm) with open sleeves and 0.51 ± 0.38 mm (range 0.05–1.7 mm; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.55 mm) with closed sleeves; the difference was slightly significant ( p = 0.0477).

Although there was a slightly significant overall difference in the mean time spent at the center between the three groups (p = 0.0479), a Newman Keuls multiple comparisons test failed to reach statistical significance.

Overall surgery time in Group 1 was 7.5 ± 1.22 min (range: 5–12 min) and 6.6 ± 1.76 min (range: 4.6–12 min) in Group 2, that is slightly significant ( p = 0.048).

These accelerations were also different between the two groups ( F (1,34) = 4.392, p = 0.044) for body axes ( F (1,34) = 12.048, p = 0.001); furthermore, a slightly significant interaction was found between group and fallers/non-fallers ( F (1,34) = 4.208; p = 0.048), as these accelerations were higher in the i -WG fallers.

On the contrary, only two glycans showed reduction in the patient group in a slightly significant (m/z 1915, p = 0.048) and a non-significant (m/z = 2220) manner.

The Teamwork and Collaboration subscale (9 items, maximum score 45) changed from 41.5 ± 3.8 (n =23) to 42.6 ± 3.4 (n = 21) ( p = 0.321) whereas Professional Identity changed from (25.3 ± 3.5 (n = 23) to (27.3 ± 3.1 (n = 21) out of a maximum of 30 (with items 10-12 reverse scored) showed a slightly significant increase ( p = 0.048).

Factors associated with CM treatment outcomes among study participants Among CM-positive participants who received triple therapy (fluconazole, 5FC, and amphotericin), 3(60.0%) recovered and 2(40%) were ongoing with treatments while those received fluconazole alone; 4(10%) died, 15(37.5%) recovered, and 17(42.5%) were loss to follow up, and the difference was slightly significant (p-value = 0.048).

coli in the water over time and found that the number of Daphnia had a slightly significant negative effect on the abundance of E. coli ( glm : estimate = −0.11 ± 0.06, z = −2, P = 0.048).

The intervention group showed a slightly significant increase in weight-for-age (p=0·048) and a non-significant increase in height-for-age (p=0·281), which also resulted in a non-significant difference in weight-for-height (p=0·097).

What was slightly significant was the reduction in time to defervescence (HR = 1.88; 95% CI = 0.81–4.35; p = 0.048) [ 69 ].

This difference was slightly significant (exposure: p = 0.048; sham: p = 0.040). 3.3 Chromosomal Maldistribution The mean number of MN+ per 1000 BN did not differ between sham exposure samples and exposure samples for both time groups (2 h: p = 0.894; 24 h: p = 0.212; Figure 5C ).

A slightly significant difference was also observed in the dyslipidemia cohort ( p = 0.048).

Although the difference was lower with GEHO-NFN, it was still significant on Maxwell ( p = 0.037) and slightly significant on COCOMO81 ( p = 0.048), which proves that performance gains cannot be attributed to chance.

The results showed that only the perception of the bitter taste had a slightly significant difference in terms of the time elapsed since the last COVID-19 infection ( P = 0.048).

Interestingly, there was a slightly significant ( p = 0.048) interaction between the GA and diabetes mellitus status concerning the risk of occurrence of DES-ISR [OR (95% CI) without diabetes mellitus 1.256 (1.125–1.402) vs. with diabetes mellitus 1.022 (0.940–1.193)].

In contrast to the high individual variation, a slightly significant positive correlation was observed among only the temperate populations via isolation by distance (IBD) analysis ( R 2 = 0.6614, p = 0.048), while no such evidence was observed in the other two regions (Additional file 7 : Figure S2).

There was, however, only a slightly significant difference ( p =0.048) between FA and FHA groups, although the FHA-coated samples had the widest range of values of standard deviation.

Although there was a slightly significant result for cJSW ( p = 0.048), we were unable to find any overall differences in the mean values for the different fracture locations.

The therapy treatment effect has a slightly significant effect ( p = 0.048) on the Epworth response and thus meaningless, leading to a descending pattern: SD (11.6) < CR (7.2) < PD (6.5) < PR (5.6), the interpretation of which is of minor importance and beyond the scope of this study.