“slightly significant”

For antioxidant activity, the samples (P1–P7) displayed high capacity to scavenge DPPH free radicals with slightly significant differences ranging from 78.37 ± 0.25 to 87.21 ± 0.05 at p -value ≤0.01.

For CD, age exhibited a slightly significant HR of 1.04 (95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.010).

The P value higher than 0.05 ( P > 0.05) were considered statistically non-significant, P ≤ 0.05 were denoted by one asterisk and considered slightly significant, P ≤ 0.01 were denoted by two asterisk and considered moderately significant, and P ≤ 0.001 were denoted by three asterisk and considered highly significant.

With the increase in sample size ( n = 7), the abundance differences in arabidopsides A and B were now slightly significant ( p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively) when comparing 35% D 2 O and H 2 O.

When studied in terms of its relationship with the other two scoring systems, i.e., the GCS and the NIHSS, the FOUR score was found to have a slightly significant positive correlation with the GCS score (0.329, p < 0.01) and not to have a significant correlation with the NIHSS score (-0.179, p > 0.05).

A slightly significant association was found between cholongiocarcinoma and p-Akt expression (p = 0.01) and TGF-α expression (0.03).

The permutation analysis of variance among the phloem mycobiome also showed slightly significant differences (R 2 = 0.04, F = 2.60, p = 0.01) among the watering treatments (Fig. 5 ).

The time to event analysis of all‐cause mortality had a slightly significant advantage in favor of NP‐guided therapy (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.69–0.95; p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%).

There were no statistical differences for Pb concentrations for date (P = 0.175) and depth (P = 0.495), but the interaction was slightly significant (P < 0.01).

The batch effect was not significant in Aberdeen ( P = 0.23) and was slightly significant in Taipei ( P = 0.01; Supplementary Table).

No infection parameter (prevalence, mean abundance, mean intensity, number of free-living stages) was significantly correlated with the average temperature of the sea surface 2 or 3 months prior to collection of hosts (Month 2 and Month 3; Table 2 ), except for prevalence at Month 2 which was slightly significant ( p = 0.01) with moderate fit ( Table 2 ).

At 80 kV, a slightly significant enhancement of CNR w with increasing microbubble concentration was registered (p = 0.01) (Fig. 3c ).

However, general trend shows that effect was slightly significant among samples dried by the same method, while a significant (p < 0.01) difference was observed for the samples dried by different methods.

Statistical analysis results show no significant difference in each period for the Baumann angle (p=0.368), but a slightly significant decrease in the LHCA at the long-time period (p=0.01).

ANOVA analysis was used to test whether changes between the treatments were significant (significant P ≤ 0.005; and slightly significant P < 0.01). 3.

Significance was considered as follows for p -values: p < 0.05 (*) slightly significant, p < 0.01 (**) medium significant, and p < 0.001 (***) highly significant.

However, in the endothelium-denuded rings, indigo carmine (10 -5 M) had no effect on the phenylephrine-induced maximum contraction and produced a slightly significant leftward shift (ED 50 : P < 0.01) in the phenylephrine concentration-response curve ( Fig. 1B , Table 1 ).

Vascular density: the vascular density was quantified in the whole image (3 × 3 mm), and there was a slightly significant difference between the HbSS group and the control group (p = 0.01) in the SCP (Table 2 , Fig. 4 ).

GSH is distinguished by slightly higher concentrations in the samples from the pond; the difference between the batch grown in natural conditions and the one in the RAS is, however, slightly significant according to Šídák’s multiple comparisons test ( p < 0.01) in the liver and intestine ( Figure 1 D).

For those who had a lower narcissistic personality score (the real line), death anxiety also had a slightly significant effect on eudaimonic well-being, β = −0.11, t = −4.09, p < 0.01, 95% CI [−0.17, −0.06].

1 , indicating a slightly significant positive association between PRL and LH/FSH ratio ( r = 0.1, P = 0.01).

In the same fashion, there was a slightly significant difference ( p = 0.011) between the 1 μL and 10 μL DTaP groups in the locomotion assay ( Figure 4 b); however, the heroin-induced hyperlocomotion was still reduced in these two groups compared to the control animals.

On average, simulans individuals comprised 53% of the total matings relative to 47% of the introgression individuals, which did turn out to be slightly significant (Wilcoxon test: χ 2 = 6.4, p <0.011).

For the middle two distant bins, a slightly significant difference was observed between LPS coated wire and LPS + PEG coated wire [bin 2 (150–250 μm from edge of wire): LPS RI = 2.31, LPS + PEG RI = 1.37, p = 0.012; bin 3 (250–350 μm from edge of wire): LPS RI = 2.73, LPS + PEG RI = 1.73, p = 0.03].

Of note, the nonobese-T2D blood metabolite data had a slightly significant enrichment in phosphatidylinositols (P = 0.012) and a slight depletion in lipids (P = 0.022) (See Table S3).