“slightly significant”

From a hypothesis‐generating perspective, slightly significant correlations can still be interesting in light of previous or later correlations, especially since the results presented in the different tables were consistent over time with regard to the different growth stages.

In a study conducted in Jordan among hospitalised patients with CKD, the majority of DRPs (62%) were classified among the significant category; however, the study used a different scale (extremely significant, much significant, significant and slightly significant). 25 In a study conducted in Canada, approximately half of the observed DRPs were moderate in severity in terms of causing harm to patients with CKD. 26 The different scales used in severity assessment across the literature make the comparison seem challenging.

Overall, WC, HC, and W:HT across all mobile applications in our study demonstrated equivalence to our reference method; however, there were slightly significant under- and overestimations for WC and HC, respectively, for each application.

From IA, the indices AS1 and AS3 revealed slightly significant (at least *) age-dependent differences in Test I, irrespective of the gender (YF vs.

Dominant model provided a slightly significant association ( p- 0.077) for rs2228570 (p.Met1Thr) and rs731236 ( p- 0.060).

Secondary effects Treatment with AHS and TAHS produced a slightly significant increase of Na and Cl but hypernatremia and hyperchloremia were moderate and did not produce metabolic acidosis.

Adjusted odds ratios per 100 ppb increase in indoor TVOCs were slightly significant for upper respiratory syndrome (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.04–1.07), stuffy nose (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.01–1.02), dry throat (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03–1.09) and lower respiratory syndrome (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.01), non-specific syndrome (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.02–1.05), tiredness (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.04), angry easily (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.04) and dizziness (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.02).

However, a more recent study supports that even though KRAS tumour mutation status has no major prognostic value for relapse-free and OS in patients with stage II and III CRC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, it may actually have slightly significant prognostic value when observed in the multivariate analysis of the MSI-L/ and MSS subpopulation [ 80 ].

In summary, age does not seem to significantly influence levels of emotional intelligence, although it is slightly significant in relation to critical thinking according to these analyses. 4.

Our first MassARRAY experiment with SQ2 suggested there were slightly significant differences in MI groups ( Figure 4 ), while subsequent experiments with SQ1 and SQ3 were carried out to test the accuracy of SQ1 result, and results showed there were no differences in MI groups.

As cold storage proceeds to 7 days, a slightly significant difference in coliform count between whole carcasses and deboned breast meat was noted.

In contrast to mu activity, the beta band showed slightly significant ERD during the observation (“task” phase) and no significant ERS during “post-session 2” (Figures 3C , 4C ).

Still, other research carried out comparing behaviours in countries under similar circumstances 19 showed a slightly significant increase in trust among infected people.

As to bedrock differences, the AMOVA results showed that diverse bedrocks explained a slightly significant part of genetic variation between populations.

[31] , who reported the same attractive effect on males, with some females also exhibiting slightly significant responses.

Images acquired on the 64-slice Optima 660 CT scanner showed a slightly significant association between dose descriptors and image noise, with a higher noise for lower doses.

However, P values less than 0.10 were regarded as statistically marginally or slightly significant since current purpose is to detect a broad range of biomedical factors (including even nonsignificant factors) that make any influence on the viscera. 3.

Thus, the α diversity of the content microbiota showed a slightly significant difference between the two groups.

In all cases, a p value less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant, less than 0.1 was considered slightly significant, and greater than 0.1 was regarded as non-significant.

There was also a slightly significant association with tumor grade.

revealed that the random survival forest model exhibited a slightly significant improvement over the traditional Cox regression model for discrimination power, which was potentially attributed to its enhanced capability of detecting and elucidating higher‐order interactions, as well as nonlinear relationships [ 51 ].

Vergence eye movements during distractor trials showed neither a peak response (mean ± std: −0.013 ± 0.062) nor a clear delay response (mean ± std: 0.001 ± 0.056), but a slightly significant response increase of 3.3 × 10 −5 deg/ms was visible.

However, there were slightly significant difference was observed between the ramipril and conventional groups.

For survival analysis, the p value of the estimated coefficient of w was slightly significant in Models 1 and 5, and the p value of the estimated coefficient of r was not significant in Models 2 and 5 in the “cox” analysis.

Considering that slightly significant heterogeneity was detected, we selected the fixed-effect model.