“slightly significant”

The mean differences between the achieved vault and predicted vault of the horizontal-placement eyes in groups A, B, C and D were 23.14 ± 233.20 μm, -46.39 ± 189.22 μm, 9.45 ± 187.43 μm, and − 76.72 ± 165.68 μm, respectively, and the prediction errors of the other three groups were not statistically significant ( P = 0.268, 0.649, 0.156) except for group B, which showed a slightly significant difference ( P = 0.03).

Using the median risk score as a cutoff to classify the lung cancer patients into 2 groups, Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( Supplementary Figure S4 ) demonstrated a slightly significant difference in survival outcome in the TCGA LUAD cohort ( log -rank test: P value = 3.01 × 10 −2 ).

The haplotype CCAA showed a slightly significant difference (p = 0.03078) between controls and all infertile patients (OR = 1.389, 95% CI = 1.039–1.855), and the haplotype CCCC showed statistically significant frequencies between the control group and a combination of all patients (OR = 3.313, 95% CI = 1.488–7.659; p = 0.003880), between control and severe oligozoospermia group (OR = 6.687, 95% CI = 2.461–17.72; p = 0.0000449) and between controls and all azoospermia, severe oligozoospermia and oligozoospermia group respectively (OR = 3.326, 95% CI = 1.4–8.035; p = 0.007307).

The cortex volume ( Figure 3 f) significantly decreased with age ( p < 0.0001), with the model also detecting a slightly significant interaction between method and age ( p = 0.0310).

The differentiation test between experimental and additional in situ samples was not significant at 20 m ( F ST =0.007; p =0.669; table 1 ) and slightly significant at 40 m ( F ST =0.013; p =0.031).

The six-month and first-year patient survival rates were similar between the <20 years, 20–40 years, 40–60 years, and ≥60 years groups, showing only a slightly significant difference (Log-rank p = .0314 and p = .0372); however, the five-year and during the study period patient survival rates in these groups were significantly different (Log-rank p < .001 and p < .0001).

The frequency of cSS- and Aβ-positive patients (as shown in Figure 2 ) for each region is plotted in Figure 3A , and Spearman’s Rho analysis showed a slightly significant positive correlation ( r s = 0.277, p = 0.032).

In contrast, there was a slightly significant increase in the expression of the FAK gene (1.41-fold) in lung tissue of the low-dose PCA-BSA@FA-NPs-treated group compared to the healthy control group ( p = 0.032).

Nearly 15.0% patients with UA, 25.5% with NSTEMI and 11.7% with STEMI had dyslipidemia and showed a slightly significant association between dyslipidemia and NSTEMI ( P = 0.032).

A slightly significant weak correlation between transcription levels and BrdU track length was observed in euchromatin (Pearson’s R = −0.07, P = 3.28 × 10 −2 , n = 817), but no significant correlation was determined in heterochromatin (Pearson’s R = −0.02, P = 6.11 × 10 −1 , n = 762) ( Fig. 4C ).

Regarding diagnostic confidence for 1.5 T, there was no significant difference between CR and DLR imaging for T1 ( p = 0.083) but slightly significant differences for FLAIR ( p = 0.033) and more significant changes for T2 ( p = 0.007) and T1CE ( p < 0.001) in favor of DLR, Figure 6 A.

Biomarkers in relation to LMN involvement Considering the extent of LMN involvement, NfL showed slightly significant differences after adjustment for ALS-PR and UMN involvement (NfL: F (4, 57) = 2.835, P = 0.033, partial η 2 = 0.166).

TLIF-patients had slightly significant more complications than PLIF-patients (TLIF = 16.6%/PLIF = 11.9%, P = .0338).

Interaction between DSC class and the diagnosis of COVID-19 was slightly significant ( P = .034).

By stratifying patients according to the ICR/GIE classification of week 12 biopsies we found a slightly significant difference ( p value = 0.035, log-rank test) in OS and in PFS ( p value = 0.022, log-rank test) between the High-ICR/GIE and the High-ICR/Non-GIE group (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig 9b ).

Only a slightly significant difference was determined among Kalamata communities sampled in the two seasons (R = 0.2185, p = 0.035; Table S5 ).

The results using the degree as an indicator show that the Matthew effect is not significant in the three networks, although it is slightly significant in the institutional network (Net1), having a low value (−0.027, p = 0.035).

Regarding sociodemographic characteristics, those who reported that they ever married had slightly significant lower scores (5.1% times less, p -value = 0.035).

In respect to the overall hypoglycemia rate, only the BEGIN Basal-Bolus T2 study 16 showed a slightly significant reduction in hypoglycemia in T2DM patients (−18%, P =0.0359).

The interaction between air and root-zone temperature was slightly significant ( P = 0.036) and the plants grown at 20°C root zone temperature produced the lowest final dry weight, in all cases.

Although slightly significant differences were found at 13,14,15 and 20 years of age, the statistical significance level (p = 0.036, 0.042, 0.047 and 0.037 respectively) and the sample size let us to consider the AC/A ratio as no clinically relevant in regards of the development of refractive error in patients affected by accommodative esotropia.

Moreover, a slightly significant decrease ( p = 0.036, g = 0.48) in the duration of the F-phase was found in PD patients compared to control subjects.

Both β 1a AAA mutants induced a small shift in the voltage-dependence of intracellular Ca 2+ transients towards more positive potentials, that was slightly significant ( p = 0.036) for zf-β 1a AAA (8.94 ± 2.32 mV; n = 14) compared to zf-β 1a (−0.06 ± 3.49 mV; n = 9), but highly significant ( p = 0.003) for rb-β 1a AAA (7.56 ± 0.97 mV; n = 41) in comparison to rb-β 1a (1.69 ± 1.81 mV; n = 23).

A slightly significant difference ( p = 0.036) among the bacterial composition of lesions (E) compared to other samples was observed when beta-diversity analysis, with weighted UniFrac distances were used, but no differences among samples were observed in Bray‐Curtis dissimilarity ( Figure 3 A).

Comparison between human versus porcine cells In comparison to the human nasal cell culture, the porcine tracheal cells showed only a slightly significant difference at the concentration of 0.001% ( P = 0.0367).