Barely Significant
← all phrases

“trending towards significance”

516 sentences · 516 papers · 646 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.15

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

trending towards significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
In this dataset, high MVD was significantly associated with decreased relapse free survival in a univariate analysis when tested as a continuous variable ( p = 0.04), and was also trending towards significance in Kaplan–Meier analyses when the sample set was divided into halves based upon the rank order expression of this gene set ( p = 0.06) (Fig. 3 B).
trending towards significanceP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Specifically, stronger inhibitory CPM effect was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Spearman r = 0.33, P = 0.04) and sgACC (Pearson r = 0.34, P = 0.03) in the whole group (see Table 3, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ), and similarly stronger inhibitory CPM effect in males was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Pearson r = 0.58 P = 0.01) and trending towards significance in the sgACC (Pearson r = 0.47, P = 0.06) (see Fig. 10, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ).
trending towards significanceP = 0.0611.2× alphagold
The presence of psychiatric comorbidities was associated with over a 1.5x increase in the odds of belonging to the “slow pain improvement” group vs the “fast pain improvement” group (OR = 1.65, P = 0.061; trending towards significance) or the “no pain improvement” group (OR = 1.53, P = 0.037).
trending towards significancep = 0.06141.2× alphagold
There was no significant effect of context on total number of lever presses [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 3.051, p = 0.1188] and on response rate [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 0.2291, p = 0.6450] but the effect was trending towards significance for reward rate [RM two-way ANOVA: F (1,8) = 4.729, p = 0.0614] during the scheduled reinforcement phase in WT mice.
trending towards significancep = 0.0671.3× alphagold
However, further statistical analysis (Tukey’s post hoc test) revealed significant differences between these two groups only for IL-6 and IL-17A (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002, respectively) while a difference trending towards significance was found for IFNγ (p = 0.067), most likely because of the high variability observed within the 3 short-term treatment groups for this cytokine.