“weakly significant”

For correlation between HA and macrophages ( Figure 5d ), results revealed a weakly significant positive correlation (r=0.3807, p=0.0289).

In contrast, % OD-positive cells were left only weakly significant ( p = 0.029), while bSPS showed no significance anymore ( p = 0.13).

Post hoc multiple comparisons confirmed Hypothesis 3 and revealed a significant increase in median trigger time (+37 ms, p = 4.4253e-8, BF 10 = 3.668e+7) and weakly significant increase in IQR (+7.2 ms, p = 0.029, BF 10 = 0.85) for all PE pred bins with the addition of a Gaussian blur.

In mice, there was a weakly significant correlation between these two variables (r=-0.11; p=0.030), but the direction of this correlation was opposite to the reviewers’ prediction.

Convergent and divergent validity of Osteoarthritis Symptom Inventory Scale and its subscores with neuropathic pain Pearson correlation coefficient between OASIS9 total scores and DN4 scores was weakly significant ( r = 0.21, P = 0.03) (Table 7 ).

We found that the AUC value was low in the test set, and the KM-curve in the test set is only weakly significant ( p = 0.03), and the curves separate marginally in the first years of follow-up but eventually meet again after 5 years.

The result for the Jacobian motility metric remained similar with a weakly significant R coefficient of 0.19; p = 0.03.

In the small WWTP (Tartu), the raw abundance of ARGs decreased after purification but the decrease was statistically significant only for bla ctx-m-32 and tetM (p<0.01), and weakly significant for bla oxa-58 (p = 0.03).

Only a weakly significant correlation was found in the olfactory bulb ( Figure 4 D, R 2 = 0.48, p = 0.03, n = 10).

This is a weakly significant enrichment ( P = 0.03) compared to what is observed for genes that do not have dN/dS values significantly higher than 1 (40.2% globally expressed).

A two-factor ANOVA confirmed a significant main effect of frequency (n = 8 subjects, F 4,70 =36.3, p<0.0001) but not delay time (F 1,70 =3.1, p=0.08), and only a weakly significant interaction (F 4,70 =2.9, p=0.03).

The maximum peak height in the TIP3P RDF was lower than those of the other models, but the difference was only weakly significant ( p = 0.03), and the peak centers and second shell structures were statistically indistinguishable between water models.

Of the measured plant growth and grain yield characteristics (total biomass, spike biomass, vegetative biomass, total seed weight, thousand grain weight and total spikes) there were no significant effects due to presence of the overexpression construct, except for a weakly significant ( P =0.03) decrease in thousand grain weight for positive lines.

Gentoo penguin locations had higher RPD values compared to RPD values across the entire HFR field but these were weakly significant (p = 0.03, two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests respectively, Fig. 3b ).

There is also a weakly significant effect for the fellow eye ( P < 0.03).

Indeed, we observed weakly significant enrichment of predicted miR-9 direct targets amongst the TF targets of miR-9 controlled compared with non-miR-9 controlled TFs (22.1 versus 18.0%; P = 0.03).

However, there was a weakly significant linear relationship between the logarithm of chromaticity thresholds to blue CAD stimuli and the logarithm of waveguiding cone densities controlling for age ( p = 0.03, F-test).

However the one weakly significant compound ( p = 0.03) had a false discovery rate of 0.4, which made a true correlation unlikely (KW q -values, Supplementary Table S1 ).

In Table 6 , the odds of utilizing the before (discharging) postnatal care among rural women with primary education are still low, but the level of significance changed from being weakly significant (or = 0.06[CI = 0.38,0.95]p = 0.030) to being not statistically significant (or = 0.82[CI = 0.59,1.12]p>.05).

There was a weakly significant increase in numbers of cavitated goblet cells in jejunum tissue of rats treated with MTX (at day 6, P = 0.03).

Using the same approach, we analysed the effects of day and night (i.e., circadian rhythm) and found a discrete, but consistent difference with significantly higher values at nighttime in the cages with the males ( p = 7.4 × 10 −16 ); in the cages with the females this covariation was smaller and only weakly significant ( p = 3 × 10 −2 ) (see Supporting Materials, Figure S3 ).

The relative odds of bug infection stratified by intervention period was 5.5-fold (95% CI: 4.28–7.06) greater when a domestic infestation was detected rather than when it was not (MH χ 2 = 224.8, df = 1, P < 0.001), with weakly significant heterogeneity between periods (homogeneity χ 2 = 7.3, df = 1, P = 0.03).

There was a weakly significant correlation between LC-MS/MS measurements and fluid balance; Pearson’s r was −0.28 ( p = 0.03).

However, we did observe that L77A caused a weakly significant increase in MT number beginning at 150 s ( Figure 5C , p ~ 0.03).

This may be an artefact of the reduced sample size in the isotopic analyses and a relatively weakly significant relationship between mandibular shape and δ 15 N values ( p = 0.03).