approaching significancep = 0.06
No significant differences were noted in AXL between children at LR and HR for myopia at any specific visit ( p ≥ 0.06 for all), approaching significance at V7 ( F = 3.64, p = 0.06).
No significant differences were noted in AXL between children at LR and HR for myopia at any specific visit ( p ≥ 0.06 for all), approaching significance at V7 ( F = 3.64, p = 0.06).
In terms of changes over time, generalised linear models with age as a covariate showed a trend towards smaller (worse) HO-SR with time (area for the entire retina: F = 2.01, p = 0.06; Figure 4a ).
40 Although this is the case for metrics that include all HOAs, such as the HO-Strehl Ratio (HO-SR) or HO-Root-Mean-Square (HO-RMS), there is a clear trend for individuals with myopia to have less positive or more negative primary spherical aberration [SA, Zernike coefficient C(4,0)]. 24,26,29,34,36,41–43 It has been suggested that this association of SA and myopia may be simply a consequence of the longer axial length in myopes, but this does not see
When the analyses were repeated with subjects categorised into LR and HR for myopia, the results did not reach statistical significance.