The association between mothers’ Vit-D3 and newborn UCB Vit-D3 was highly significant (R=0.744; P =0.000), indicating a direct dependence of the newborn’s Vit-D3 on the mother’s Vit-D3 sources.
Excerpts
Effect of Stachys circinata Extracts on Catalase Activity and Glutathione Concentrations Our data showed that the CAT activity was highly significant in cells treated with different concentrations of S. circinata extract as compared to the control group ( p = 0.000) ( Figure 2 ).
The level of adherence was cross-tabulated with both hospitals, and the strength of association was calculated using a chi-square test (α = 0.05), which was found to be highly significant (p = 0.000).
“Trust” had a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000);“communication” and “academic attainment” had significant positive associations (p = 0.033 and 0.024, respectively) with VBD acceptance in the students cohort, while these predictors were insignificant in the teachers community.
For the right side localization, main effect was highly significant F (1, 28) = 116.26 P = 0.000, partial eta squared = 0.806, non-verbal belief processing showed slight increase compared to the robust improvement observed in verbal processing (mean 1 = 0.028 and mean 2 = 2.142).
But using acidic extract, irradiation of fabric and extract ( p = 0.000) and variation in treatment, that is, RE, NRE, RFRF and NRF are highly significant ( p = 0.000).
intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).
The correlation between the two SIPRe samples (junior and expert therapists) was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.936; p<000).
There was a significant trend for PD patients with CI to score lower in the domains of memory ( p = 0.00) and verbal fluency ( p = 0.04, shown in Table 5 ).
It turns out the MADa and DSIM are relatively small and highly significant (p = 0.000) with a linear correlation approximately 0.8.
Our logistic regression model was significantly better as it explained more of the variance in the outcome, which was reflected by the highly significant chi-square value (chi-square = 2365.3, df = 17, p < .000).
Again analysis of variance test was highly significant ( P =.000) for the knowledge score and the level in the college of the participants but not significant for the attitude and the level in the college of the participants, as the P value was. 301, as shown in Table 4 .
After adjusting for age and gender in his study, there was a highly significant difference between stage IV patients and stage I patients (HR = 8.81, 95% CI: 3.20-24.22, p = 0.000) ( 49 ).
A P-value was set as very highly significant (P<0.000), highly significant (P<0.001), significant (P<0.05), and non-significant (P>0.05).
A highly significant association was found with place of residence ( p = .000), and a significant association was found with age ( p = .050).
Sex effects revealed a highly significant ( p = 0.000) AUC in all the groups even at each time point.
In both cases, there was considerably significant heterogeneity (I 2 83%, p = 0.00; I 2 89%, p = 0.00).
Hole cross test (HCT) The F-statistic from the analysis of variance has appeared to be highly significant (F = 12.33; p = 0.000), showing statistically significant variation across the groups in the hole cross test.
Bartlett’s test results were also extremely significant ( p = 0.00).
That distinction was emphasized by pairwise examination between approaches; the difference between Retinal and Thalamic distributions not rising to significance, but both comparisons with the Cortical distribution were highly significant (ANOVA, F 2, 101 = 9.3, p = 0.000; p R-T = 0.8, p R-C = 0.000, p T-C = 0.003; Fig. 2 i).
The likelihood ratio statistics (LR chi-square (60) = 356.33) are highly significant P < 0.0000).
Discriminant Analysis All trace and macro element concentrations included in the discriminant function analysis were highly significant in discriminating between the cruises (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.149; F = 47.30; p < 0.000; Table 4 ).
According to BMI groups a highly significant difference in many patient satisfaction domains were found (P< 0.000).
Specifically, the calculation results of the meta-analysis revealed a moderately significant relationship between motivation and loyalty (r = 0.420, 95%CI = [0.321–0.505], p<0.000) with 16 observations.
The mean value of the responses to the questions related to the overall experience of the pain before visiting the pain clinic was 3.81 ± 1.42 and after visiting the pain clinic was 2.14 ± 1.05 which was highly significant ( P = 0.000).