The results showed a highly significant correlation between meniscal injuries on MRI and intraoperative findings ( p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
In contrast, a decreasing trend in FCR ( p < 0.0001) was observed in Cobb 500, Ross 308, and Ross strains when fed P- and Ca-deficient basal diet supplemented with phytase.
The effect of TYPE was highly significant (χ 2 (3) = 669, p < 0.0001), and the full model was strongly superior to the null (ΔAIC = –657).
The lactation number was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) when comparing LCS groups, as well as the age of the animals ( p < 0.0001).
Finally, from April to October, the fat-to-protein ratio in high-yield cows was lower than in low-yield cows, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
The model has good explanatory power (adjusted R 2 = 0.54) and the slope and intercept are both highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The concordance between direct microscopy and culture was highly significant, moderate for dogs ( p < 0.0001; kappa value: k = 0.53), but highly significant and perfect for cats ( p < 0.0001; k = 1.00) ( Table 1 ). 3.3.
The Friedman test revealed a highly significant reduction in clusters in the whole cohort (p < 0.0001), as well as in both the SE ( p = 0.0163) and IE ( p = 0.0102) subgroups ( Table 1 , Figure 4 ).
Those shifts ranged from a modest four-percentage-point increase in support of legalization to a substantial 12-point jump in the share who said it us “safe for pit bulls to live in residential neighborhoods.” The differences in percentages from 2014 to 2018 for the first three questions in Figure 1 are all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the four-point difference in support for legalization shown in the final column of the figure is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
The model was highly significant (F = 117.22; p < 0.0001) and accounted for 82.4% of the variance in planned spending (R 2 = 0.824).
The TMAO concentrations showed a highly significant difference between patients with CKD and healthy controls ( p < 0.0001).
The interaction between maturity and stress was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and this result was confirmed by all the pairwise comparisons among the stressed vs. control groups.
A statistically highly significant interaction of beverage type × storage time was also demonstrated ( p < 0.0001).
The differences in the duration of clutch stages 2–4 were highly significant (F 2,18 = 861.20, p < 0.0001 and F 2,18 = 408.22, p < 0.0001, the most conservative and liberal estimates, respectively), as were those concerning their rate of embryonic development (F = 22.99, p < 0.0001), and neither of these varied significantly among females (stage duration more conservative: F 9,18 = 0.46, p = 0.88; stage duration most liberal: F 9,18 = 1.66, p = 0.17; embryonic development rate: F 9,18 = 0.92, p = 0.53) ( Figure 2 ).
Among treatments, QE and QL produced the highest reduction in bait intake, particularly at higher concentrations (50 and 100 ppm), where differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both sexes.
The treatment effect was examined within each parity because the overall treatment by parity interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Haematological Parameters Comparing infected and non-infected tilapias, the infected tilapias show a highly significant increase in white blood cells count compared to non-infected ones ( p < 0.0001).
Although not entirely valid, given the informality of the study, it is nevertheless interesting to note that this difference was highly significant (Chi square p < 0.0001).
In this case, the determined regression equation was also highly significant, as were its coefficients ( p ≤ 0.0001).
However, the time × prototype interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of time on L-Lys release depended on the prototype used. 4.
The difference was highly significant in this case ( p = 0.00013). 3.2.
A one-way ANOVA analysis showed a highly significant effect of origin on CI at the end of the winter conditioning (week 9) (F = 15.95, p = 0.00018).
Cadmium shows highly significant differences in concentrations between environments for bones ( p = 0.0002) and significant differences for hair ( p = 0.0056), with higher concentrations in anthropized environments.
In Model 2 (NB Regression with Region), only episodes remained highly significant (β = 0.00505, SE = 0.00137, z = 3.69, p = 0.0002), while latitude became marginally significant ( p = 0.096); area lost significance ( p = 0.119).
The effect of claw on the variance of the difference between the two measures was highly significant (−2LL difference 48.2; df.18; p < 0.0003).