Significance was defined at p ≤ 0.05 and a statistical trend at p ≤ 0.10.
Excerpts
Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were observed for Chitinophagales (markedly higher in LI), with Enterobacterales showing marginal significance ( p < 0.1) ( Figure 2 b).
Cyathostomin species frequency of presence was determined by the percentage of horses harboring the species at each given time point and treatment and analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey all-pair comparison method with significance determined at ( p ≤ 0.05) and a tendency toward significance at (0.05 ≤ p ≥ 0.10).
However, the development rate of the 10 μg/mL LPS group displayed a decreasing trend in the 2-cell stage (95.0%, p < 0.1) compared with the control group (99.4%) and a significant decrease after the 4-cell stage (4-cell 83.0%, morula 71.0%, and blastocyst 62.0%, p < 0.05) compared with the control group (4-cell 93.6%, morula 84.9%, and blastocyst 82.0%). 3.3.
showed a trendp < 0.10
Within each SC, piglets under MM + POOR SC fed AA+ showed a trend ( p < 0.10) of higher final BW, ADFI, and ADG compared to those of piglets fed the CON diet during Phase 2.
The results are presented as the mean ± SEM, with p ≤ 0.05 (significant), p < 0.01 (highly significant), and 0.05 < p < 0.10 (tendency toward significance). 3.
In the univariate analysis for the entire group, age, ESR, CRP, A/G, NLR and the SIRS criteria, were significantly associated with mortality ( p < 0.05), whereas the WBC count showed a statistical trend toward significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1).
Additionally, the jejunal VH, jejunal CD, and V/C in the duodenum showed an increasing trend ( p < 0.1). 3.5.
All statistical analyses were done using the GraphPad Prism v.5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA); p < 0.05 was considered as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant, and p < 0.1 as a trend. 3.
A statistical trend was considered for p ≤ 0.10.
a trend towards significancep < 0.1
The significance was set at p < 0.05, and a trend towards significance was considered for 0.05 < p < 0.1.
showed a trendp ≤ 0.1
rs420693815 of LEP showed a trend for milk yield and fat percentage ( p ≤ 0.1).
a trend toward significancep < 0.10
A trend toward significance was defined as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.
a trend toward significancep ≤ 0.10
Significance was defined as p < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was defined as 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10.
showed a trendp < 0.1
In the present study, the sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (GPC synonym) concentration was higher in the SCK group than in the CON group, but was not significant ( p > 0.05), and the glycerophospholipid metabolism pathway showed a trend (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1).
In addition, a decreasing trend was observed in the abundance of NK4A214 in the LMet and HMet groups compared with the CON group ( p < 0.1).
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, with p < 0.01 considered highly significant, and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 regarded as a tendency. 3.
Only a slight trend was detected in the pH of the cecum content ( p < 0.1), with C+ obtaining the higher value. 3.2.
This comparison was always made if the effect of “repetition”, “phase”, or their interaction was marginally significant p ≤ 0.1 in the ANOVA.
In piglets, only IgG levels showed an increasing trend (0.05 < p < 0.10). 3.7.
showed a trendp = 0.10
[ 13 ] showed a trend ( p = 0.10) for an increased partial oxygen pressure ( p O 2 ) in umbilical cord blood of newly born piglets when an increasing dose of maternal dietary nitrate was fed.
a trend towards significancep < 0.10
Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and considered a trend towards significance at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.
The significance of linear and quadratic responses was declared at p < 0.05 and a statistical trend was considered for 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.
approached significancep < 0.1
We also indicate when results approached significance ( p < 0.1).
Although not statistically significant, Correlation analysis indicated a positive trend toward increasing ESR with advancing age in both the healthy and disease groups (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10). 3.4.