Excerpts

The total therapy time in 6 weeks showed a trend influence in IL-6 med and IL-6 min models (IL-6 med p = 0.082; IL-6 min p = 0.099) ( Table 4 , for estimates, see Tables S7–S10 ). 3.7.

On the other hand, with regard to the number of teeth, the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis ( Table 3 and Table 4 ) show a marginally significant association with 20–27 teeth in women (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.94–2.80, p = 0.082, reference: 0–9 teeth); otherwise, no statistically significant association was observed.

SMI was also decreased with increasing education status, however, the changes were marginally significant ( p = 0.082).

The apparent association increased post-intervention for both contaminants, and the association became significant for Pb (X 2 of 9.75 and p = 0.002), but the association for A S was not quite significant (X 2 of 4.61 and p = 0.082).

The lockdown did not lead to a significant decrease in fractures but, instead, yielded a highly significant increase in mild traumatic brain injuries when compared to all injuries that occurred ( p = 0.082 and p = 0.0001) as well as acute injuries (excluding contusions, distortions and miscellaneous non-acute injuries) ( p = 0.309 and p = 0.034).

However, when the structural language scales were examined separately in children with DLD, none of them reached significance, although the syntactic and pragmatic scales almost reached significance ( p = 0.083; p = 0.077). 3.4.3.

[ 36 ], changes in fatigue levels of working or studying healthy young adults were only marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.084, large effect size) and decreased after exposure to a forest environment (mean pre-test = 1.22; mean post-test = 0.81), supporting this suggestion.

Conversely, the frequency of efficacy posts was the lowest in the initial phase (65%), as compared with the pre-crisis (82%) and the maintenance (100%) phase, though the differences were only marginally significant ( χ 2 = 4.94, p = 0.084).

Trial-by-Trial Regression Analysis on Generalization For the generalized linear regression with three kinds of response, there was a significant difference in generalization for expected value ( β = 0.07, SE = 0.02, z = 4.31, p < 0.001) and a marginally significant difference for URPE ( β = −0.03, SE = 0.02, z = −1.72, p = 0.084), but not for the outcome ( β = 0.001, SE = 0.01, z = 0.15, p = 0.883).

Stratifying according the season, OR was 1.133 [95%CI 0.984–1.340] during the warm season ( p = 0.084, borderline significant) and 1.136 [95% CI 1.025–1.259] during the cold season ( p = 0.015).

374.19 ± 615.97 pg/mL displayed as a percentage of the baseline, p = 0.001, Figure 2 B) as subgroup δ displays a borderline significant p -value (199.26 ± 75.73 vs. 225.12 ± 79.13 pg/mL, p = 0.085, Figure 2 B).

All of the study’s main effects and interactions remained significant, apart from the interaction between student PLE and teacher school context efficacy on average class general distress that became only marginally significant with the inclusion of student gender as a covariate (B = −0.009, SE = 0.005, p = 0.086). 4.

Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the relationship between waist circumference and the drinking of carbonated sweet drinks was nearly statistically significant in the ADHD group ( p = 0.086).

Inward attention increased for both groups during the condition, though only reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.086).

Delta analysis showed a trend toward significant difference ( Z = −1.726, p = 0.087, r = 0.27) between the two groups.

Additionally, high income (≥R1000) also indicated to increase the likelihood of hypertension though with the borderline significance [( p = 0.087, OR = 1.47; 0.95–4.29). 3.2.

The second model (gender and race distance) showed a trend for a race distance effect (F = 6.0, p = 0.087) and an interaction effect (F = 15.4, p < 0.001); pairwise comparisons showed that men were faster than women in 100 mile and 200 mile races ( Figure 3 ).

For respondents reporting sexual abuse, the odds of being in the clinical group compared to the community sample with no chronic conditions has borderline significance (group D vs. group A; OR/CI 2.51/0.88–7.20; p = 0.087).

We also tried to estimate prednisolone use’s association with the risk of HZ, but the difference was only marginally significant between HZ and non-HZ in non-CIC RA patients ( p = 0.0874; Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 ).

Interestingly, a decreasing trend in the IL-18 concentration was seen, although the p -value for global differences was on the borderline of statistical significance ( p = 0.0874).

Nevertheless, Participants in the BR + EX group showed a trend towards the improvement in grip strength with borderline significance ( p = 0.088).

Although there is a marginally significant effect between FFHR and the social domain of QoL (B = 0.036, p = 0.088) in the logistic regression model, the positive relationship pattern between them still could be observed.

The discomfort due to spasticity showed a trend ( p = 0.088) towards less discomfort or hindrance ( Figure 1 F).

There was a trend towards significance ( p = 0.088), correlation (r = 0.382) between changes in balance and baseline pain.

These two outcomes were also not associated with age or gender, although education might potentially have some effect on coping ability, as it was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.088) but did not remain in the final model.