Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similar results were obtained in a meta-analysis including 23 studies that assessed the role of CSF p-tau in predicting conversion from MCI to ADD [ 76 ], where SMD was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for the comparisons between stable MCI versus MCI converted to ADD (−1.03 [CI −1.47, −0.59]).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This analysis revealed highly significant main effects of dose (F 4,160 ≈ 848.5, p < 0.0001), wavelength (F 1,160 ≈ 252.2, p < 0.0001), and cellular age-status (F 1,160 ≈ 1466.8, p < 0.0001), indicating that metabolic activity varied significantly with PBM fluence, irradiation source, and replicative aging.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation between Serum Mg Concentration and Isotopic Composition There is a lack of significant correlation between the serum Mg concentration and isotopic composition in all but one dataset between the present study and Grigoryan et al.—the exception being the T1DM group from Grigoryan et al., in which a highly significant inverse correlation was observed ( r = −0.70, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 ) [ 25 ].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Fisher’s exact test confirmed highly significant discrimination between patients with early-stage bladder cancer and controls ( p < 0.0001), and the corresponding OR indicated a markedly increased risk of bladder cancer above the cutoff (OR = 53.813, 95% CI 15.167–239.482).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Starting the study with MSCs separated from the adipose tissue of the patients with non-healing wounds for autological transplantation, our attention was drawn by a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the wound size and wound closure degree and by the high percentage (on average 75%) of CD34 + cells among the isolated cells [ 33 ].
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Changes in overall cell growth did not reach significance after ADAM10 single knockdown ( Figure 4 a,b) being, however, highly significant after ADAM17 knockdown ( p = 0.0001; Figure 4 c,d) and to a lesser extend also following ADAM10/17 double knockdown ( p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0027; Figure 4 e,f).